2012
DOI: 10.5577/intdentres.2012.vol2.no2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Modeling of a Cleft Lip and Palate Patient

Abstract: Aim: To demonstrate three-dimensional virtual modeling of a cleft lip and palate patient. Methodology: Traditional two-dimensional treatment planning modalities are often inadequate. Developing technology has enabled the virtual modeling of cleft lip and palate patients. Mimics software was used to demonstrate how to construct such a model. Conclusion: We are now able to model cleft lip and palate patients in three dimensions. How to cite this article: Karadede İ, Adıgüzel Ö, Özer T, Bilgiç F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rapid progress and development in computer technology have increased the accuracy of FEM analysis. Finite element analysis has become a powerful method in measuring internal stress when investigating complex systems that are difficult to standardize during in vitro and in vivo studies [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid progress and development in computer technology have increased the accuracy of FEM analysis. Finite element analysis has become a powerful method in measuring internal stress when investigating complex systems that are difficult to standardize during in vitro and in vivo studies [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D modeling of patients with cleft lip and palate using CT enables us to visualize the anatomy in more detail and to do a better study. [ 29 ] This retrospective study was conducted at Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Department of Marmara University, School of Medicine between Orthodontic Department of Marmara University, School of Dentistry. The images of a total of 30 patients aged between 9 and 12 years which were obtained from a CT device (Siemens Somatom Emotion, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) were included in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are studies in which buccal bone thickness was measured by computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) [ 6 , 10 , 15 ]. While CT allows for more detailed measurements by providing three-dimensional imaging, it has the disadvantage of a higher radiation dose than CBCT [ 16 , 17 ]. CBCT also has other advantages, such as a higher resolution than CT and shorter imaging time[ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%