2001
DOI: 10.1090/conm/276/04519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual fundamental classes of zero loci

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proof can be found in e.g. [10]. (That proof, given in the nonorbifold setting there, can be readily modified to the orbifold setting.)…”
Section: 25)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proof can be found in e.g. [10]. (That proof, given in the nonorbifold setting there, can be readily modified to the orbifold setting.)…”
Section: 25)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(from different approaches) that some suitable correlators on P r d actually produce the desired hypergeometric series. However, neither G 0,0 (P r , d) nor P r d is the right space to perform the integral (6). The way to resolve this issue was to identify M 0,1 (P r , d) as a fixed point component of C * -action on G 0,0 (P r , d).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent paper by Cox et al [3] states the following conjecture on virtual moduli cycles. Let X be a nonsingular complex projective variety; a vector bundle V on X is convex if, for every genus zero stable map ϕ : C → X, we have H 1 (C, f * V ) = 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conjecture (Cox et al [3]). Fix X and n, and let V be a convex vector bundle on X. Denote by i : Y → X the inclusion defined by the zero locus of a regular section of V , and for γ ∈ H 2 (Y, Z), denote by j γ the natural inclusionM 0,n (Y, γ) →M 0,n (X, i * γ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%