2016
DOI: 10.1177/0954411916673674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual flow-diverter treatment planning: The effect of device placement on bifurcation aneurysm haemodynamics

Abstract: Bifurcation aneurysms account for a large fraction of cerebral aneurysms and often present morphologies that render traditional endovascular treatments, such as coiling, challenging and problematic. Flow-diverter stents offer a potentially elegant treatment option for such aneurysms, but clinical use of these devices remains controversial. Specifically, the deployment of a flow-diverter device in a bifurcation entails jailing one or more potentially vital vessels with a low-porosity mesh designed to restrict t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mesh density greater than 5000 cells/mm 3 was sufficient to capture the inflow reduction with less than 1% uncertainty. This finding is consistent with previous studies and devices 21,23. The corresponding reduction in mean and maximum wall shear stress (WSS) with increasing mesh fineness was also considered.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A mesh density greater than 5000 cells/mm 3 was sufficient to capture the inflow reduction with less than 1% uncertainty. This finding is consistent with previous studies and devices 21,23. The corresponding reduction in mean and maximum wall shear stress (WSS) with increasing mesh fineness was also considered.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some recent studies show that CFD analysis may be performed in a significantly shorter time period. 28 Such evaluation time may already be applicable in the clinical decision-making process for unruptured brain aneurysms, especially if we can expect further time shortening due to technological advances. It is therefore not the computer simulation time but rather the limitations of the CFD methodology that still prevent its use in everyday clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meshing of each geometry was completed with a Projected Single Domain mesh, an Omnitree Cartesian tree type, and three near‐wall Cartesian layers to give a smooth and well‐resolved boundary definition. All the simulations were run on meshes with a minimum mesh density of 8,000 elements/mm 3 , resulting in mesh sizes between 1.9 and 4.0 million elements and assuming mesh independence as per previous studies . To reduce the computation time, a steady‐state, radially symmetric parabolic velocity profile was prescribed at the inlet of each aneurysm geometry as steady‐state flow simulations of the cerebral vasculature have been reported to be just as effective as pulsatile flow simulations for estimating most key indices .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%