2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29029-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual environments as memory training devices in navigational tasks for older adults

Abstract: Cognitive training approaches using virtual environments (VEs) might counter age-related visuospatial memory decline and associated difficulties in wayfinding. However, the effects of the visual design of a VE in route learning are not fully understood. Therefore, we created a custom-designed VE optimized for route learning, with adjusted levels of realism and highlighted landmark locations (MixedVE). Herein we tested participants’ route recall performance in identifying direction of turn at the intersection w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
42
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
4
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, direct egocentric experience of exploring an environment could be used, which is not quite the same as learning from a video (Hegarty et al ., ). Virtual reality environments with different levels of realism and highlighted landmark locations have also recently shown great potential for improving older adults’ spatial learning (Lokka, Çöltekin, Wiener, Fabrikant, & Röcke, ). Ways of presenting egocentric information other than maps should be considered as well to better understand the effects of learning input on spatial representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, direct egocentric experience of exploring an environment could be used, which is not quite the same as learning from a video (Hegarty et al ., ). Virtual reality environments with different levels of realism and highlighted landmark locations have also recently shown great potential for improving older adults’ spatial learning (Lokka, Çöltekin, Wiener, Fabrikant, & Röcke, ). Ways of presenting egocentric information other than maps should be considered as well to better understand the effects of learning input on spatial representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VR tests of spatial cognition have proved more sensitive in identifying spatial navigation deficits in patient populations compared to more classic visuospatial 'pencil-and-paper' tests like the Mental Rotation Test [5]. For older patients, VR has the added advantage to be a less costly and safer alternative to real-world navigation tests, which are time and space consuming, as well as difficult to administer to a population sometime less able to walk [6]. Until recently most VR used in research was presented on a desktop display and movement controlled via a joystick or keyboard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MixedVE, the amount and the location of the highlighted textures are carefully selected considering both visual realism and landmark theories (Röser, Hamburger, Krumnack, & Knauff, 2012;Smallman & Cook, 2011b). Specifically, we selected to highlight scene elements (using photo textures, in this case) in the MixedVE, only where the information should be relevant to route learning (further elaborated in Lokka & Çöltekin, 2017). This 'relevance' was determined based on the findings in previous empirical work, for example, there is evidence that people pay attention to the scene elements at the intersection points, specifically to those at the direction of turn; and the structural elements, such as the road network may be important in route learning (e.g., Röser, Hamburger, Krumnack, & Knauff, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the classification of tasks into three primary categories (visual, spatial, visuospatial) is a rough classification, where the task primarily would require the use of spatial memory, visual memory or both. In reality, these memory systems possibly interact with each other constantly and in ways we cannot control (see Lokka & Çöltekin, 2017 for further elaboration on our reasoning, and Cowan (1995) for an overview on memory systems). We examined participant performance separately for each task type, as well as at an aggregate level for total of tasks for each visualization type, and for each age group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%