2009
DOI: 10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v16i03/46191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Dialogue: Native and Nonnative English Speakers’ Input on Measured Written Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these challenges, one writing instruction technique that has proved successful for learning English as a second or foreign language is writing letters. Many studies have shown that writing letters, such in the case of pen pal projects and virtual e‐mail exchanges (Larrotta & Chung, 2020; Larrotta & Serrano, 2012; Lin & Fang, 2009; Quezada & Santillán, 2021; Wang, 2019) and in dialogue journals (Holmes & Moulton, 1997; Kim, 2005; Linnell, 2010; Orem, 2001), not only foster linguistic gains among learners but also facilitate dialogue, self‐reflection, expressing and exchanging of ideas, and empathy which are all necessary tools to build civic efficacy. No letter exchanges and correspondences were made among the participants; the focus of the activity was strictly for the learners to learn how to produce these letters.…”
Section: Strategies To Promote Civic Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these challenges, one writing instruction technique that has proved successful for learning English as a second or foreign language is writing letters. Many studies have shown that writing letters, such in the case of pen pal projects and virtual e‐mail exchanges (Larrotta & Chung, 2020; Larrotta & Serrano, 2012; Lin & Fang, 2009; Quezada & Santillán, 2021; Wang, 2019) and in dialogue journals (Holmes & Moulton, 1997; Kim, 2005; Linnell, 2010; Orem, 2001), not only foster linguistic gains among learners but also facilitate dialogue, self‐reflection, expressing and exchanging of ideas, and empathy which are all necessary tools to build civic efficacy. No letter exchanges and correspondences were made among the participants; the focus of the activity was strictly for the learners to learn how to produce these letters.…”
Section: Strategies To Promote Civic Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%