1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002160050718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virginia Tobacco Leaves (CTA-VTL-2) – new Polish CRM for inorganic trace analysis including microanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intensities of the SRM CTA-VTL-2 (external standard) were put in relation to the certified value of U (0.163±0.008 μg/g) in Dybczynski et al (1998) to calculate the slope of the intensity-concentration calibration curve (single point calibration). This allowed for quantification of the element intensity data of the wood samples.…”
Section: Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensities of the SRM CTA-VTL-2 (external standard) were put in relation to the certified value of U (0.163±0.008 μg/g) in Dybczynski et al (1998) to calculate the slope of the intensity-concentration calibration curve (single point calibration). This allowed for quantification of the element intensity data of the wood samples.…”
Section: Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total S was determined turbidimetrically in plant material that had been incinerated with nitric acid and magnesium nitrate to sulfate form. The results were checked against certified reference materials, Virginia Tobacco Leaves (CTA VTL-2), with the error of: P -4.5%, K -2%, Ca -2.8%, Mg -1.5% (Dybczyński et al 1998). …”
Section: Field Experiments With White Mustard (Sinapismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our laboratory the certification of the candidate reference materials is performed on the basis of world-wide interlaboratory comparison and proven data evaluation methodology [16,17,18]. The uncertainty associated with the central value combines the uncertainty due to dispersion of analytical results obtained by various methods (after rejection of outliers), i.e.…”
Section: Combined Standard Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%