2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762004000100017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viremic blood donor found by a rapid screening method in a season of high human parvovirus B19 activity in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract: Erythrovirus B19 infection is usually benign but may have serious consequences in patients with

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From 1998 to 1999, 1,303 viremic blood donors were tested by gel hemagglutination. Nine plasma showing positive or indeterminate results were analyzed by dot-blot, only the strongly positive by gel hemagglutination was confirmed by dot-blot (Setúbal et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 1998 to 1999, 1,303 viremic blood donors were tested by gel hemagglutination. Nine plasma showing positive or indeterminate results were analyzed by dot-blot, only the strongly positive by gel hemagglutination was confirmed by dot-blot (Setúbal et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that probably influences the variation seen in the results of different studies is the seasonality of the erythrovirus B19 activity. It is known that this seasonality can greatly influence the frequency of viremic donors (Setúbal et al 2004), of hydropic fetuses (Valeur-Jensen 1999), and of individuals with transient aplastic crisis (Serjeant et al 1981) in a community; there is no reason for it not to influence the frequency of B19 infection in immunodeficient patients as well. The studies most relevant for comparing our results are those of Liu et al (1997) and of Heergaard et al (2002), as these authors systematically searched for evidences of erythrovirus B19 infection in paraffin-stored bone marrow specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%