2008
DOI: 10.1159/000111047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viral Etiology for Inner Ear Diseases: Proven, Unproven, Unlikely

Abstract: This is a revision article that deals with the broad field of inner ear disease caused by viral infections. Some of these entities have been proven to have a viral etiology. Others have strong evidence in favor of a viral causation but still cannot be considered as a viral disease. Finally, other entities are suggestive of a viral etiology but when the whole body of evidence is considered one concludes that a viral etiology is indeed unlikely. We review the literature and add our own experience in this subject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea that viruses, especially those of the Herpesviridae family, might contribute to the pathogenesis of MD has remain disputed for some time. The 2008 review of Oliviera and colleagues concluded it to be unlikely that MD had any demonstrable viral etiopathology [15]. On the other hand, contemporaneous work by Gacek concluded that overall, MD simply is the manifestation of viral-infection of the inner-ear [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea that viruses, especially those of the Herpesviridae family, might contribute to the pathogenesis of MD has remain disputed for some time. The 2008 review of Oliviera and colleagues concluded it to be unlikely that MD had any demonstrable viral etiopathology [15]. On the other hand, contemporaneous work by Gacek concluded that overall, MD simply is the manifestation of viral-infection of the inner-ear [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From that perspective, it appears that viral-infections are undoubtedly relevant to MD. By contrast, as of 2008, drawing from an evidence base virtually the same as above, Oliviera and colleagues disputed there being any reliable evidence of a viral etiopathology in MD [19]. And more recently, Mirza and Gokhale judged that antiviral pharmacotherapy has had “no role in the treatment of MD” [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though, so far, there is weak evidence of the impact of COVID-19 on the audio-vestibular system, post-viral hearing dysfunction is generally known [11,28]. However, no more high-quality research on temporary, acute impact, or long-term consequences on the auditory-vestibular system is available to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study results showed similar improvement of symptoms in both groups, meaning that there was no obvious difference between the treated and control groups and that there was no evidence of benefit from the antiviral solution. Greco et al [38,39] have suggested that antiviral pharmacotherapy has largely replaced surgical management for a subset of patients with Meniere's disease, but Oliveira et al disputed the existence of a viral etiology for Meniere's disease altogether.…”
Section: The Role Of Antiviral Therapy In Meniere's Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%