Natural Resistance Mechanisms of Plants to Viruses
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3780-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viral Determinants of Resistance Versus Susceptibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, as protein 2A HP is involved in RNA2 replication (Gaire et al, 1999), and thus indirectly in encapsidation and movement, the host resistance gene could act directly by inhibiting virus replication and movement. However, many Avr factors act independently of virus accumulation (Hasi ow-Jaroszewska et al, 2011; Mansilla et al, 2009;Schoelz, 2006). Future experiments will aim to uncouple these two functions of GFLV protein 2A HP .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, as protein 2A HP is involved in RNA2 replication (Gaire et al, 1999), and thus indirectly in encapsidation and movement, the host resistance gene could act directly by inhibiting virus replication and movement. However, many Avr factors act independently of virus accumulation (Hasi ow-Jaroszewska et al, 2011; Mansilla et al, 2009;Schoelz, 2006). Future experiments will aim to uncouple these two functions of GFLV protein 2A HP .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions necessarily transition into an area of semantics that we suggest would likely benefit from some convergence, particularly when describing antiviral immune responses that are analogous to nonviral immune responses. For example, the R gene-mediated virus resistance involves specific recognition of virus-encoded Avr proteins that culminate in HR and SAR responses, as shown for TMV N gene resistance and others (Whitham et al, 1994;Liu et al, 2002a;Schoelz, 2006). However, it is unclear whether they can be classified as ETI responses because of the existing definition (or lack thereof) of what constitutes an effector protein for diverse pathogen types (i.e., viruses versus bacteria).…”
Section: Future Prospects and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the case of tobacco N-mediated resistance, the TMV-encoded p50 protein is recognized by the N protein and its cofactor NRIP1 to elicit the Nmediated host immune response (Caplan et al, 2008). These and several other instances reviewed in detail elsewhere (Schoelz, 2006) beg the following question: Should these virulence-promoting factors be referred to as effectors and the immune responses they trigger be classified as ETI responses? Based on the analogous functions of nonviral effector proteins, we propose a working definition for viral effectors: Viral effectors are virus-encoded proteins that when present in host cells interfere with host defense signaling components to promote virulence.…”
Section: Future Prospects and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations