2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viral cultures, cycle threshold values and viral load estimation for assessing SARS-CoV-2 infectiousness in haematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant patients: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Viral culture has been reported infrequently in respiratory samples with cycle thresholds above 25 [34], and it is likely to assume similar results within faecal samples with high Ct values. Selecting samples with a RT-PCR cycle count of higher than 25 greatly reduces the likelihood of being able to culture SARS-CoV-2 [32, 39, 42]. In the studies in this review, in general, samples with relatively high RT-PCR cycle counts were subjected to viral culture testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral culture has been reported infrequently in respiratory samples with cycle thresholds above 25 [34], and it is likely to assume similar results within faecal samples with high Ct values. Selecting samples with a RT-PCR cycle count of higher than 25 greatly reduces the likelihood of being able to culture SARS-CoV-2 [32, 39, 42]. In the studies in this review, in general, samples with relatively high RT-PCR cycle counts were subjected to viral culture testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our HCW policy was adapted in 2022 to a non-PCR follow-up policy, as the risk of transmission after 7 days of isolation was considered low [ 25 ]. Nowadays, for immunocompromised haematological and solid transplant patients, the infectious period is generally estimated to be 14–21 days [ [29] , [30] , [31] ], but as we also have experienced, it is sometimes much longer [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between Ct values and the isolation of viable virus has been studied [ [15] , [16] , [17] ]. A Ct value > 30 could be used for ending isolation in clinically improving patients at least 21 days after symptom onset [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the presence of culturable virus despite high Ct values might contribute to the high transmission rates of the Omicron variant [ 19 ]. Considering the difference in sensitivity among several RT-PCR and variant-specific differences in viral dynamics, we adopted Ct value ≥ 38 as the cutoff for ending isolation/precaution during the Omicron wave, although values lower than or comparable to 35 were generally used as the cutoff Ct in the test-to release protocol [ 8 , 10 , [15] , [16] , [17] ]. Isolation/precaution was continued after transfer to a non-COVID-19 ward in patients with Ct values 35–37.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%