2015 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccnc.2015.7069430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VIP: Joint traffic engineering and caching in Named Data Networks

Abstract: Emerging information-centric networking architectures seek to optimally utilize both bandwidth and storage for efficient content distribution. This highlights the need for joint design of traffic engineering and caching strategies. We present a systematic framework for joint dynamic interest request forwarding and dynamic cache placement and eviction, within the context of the Named Data Networking (NDN) architecture. The framework employs a virtual control plane which operates on the user demand rate for data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our framework, and adaptive algorithm, leaves many open questions, including jointly optimizing caching and routing decisions; this is even more pertinent in the presence of congestion, as in [38]. The excellent performance of the greedy heuristic in our simulations further attests to the need for establishing its performance formally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Our framework, and adaptive algorithm, leaves many open questions, including jointly optimizing caching and routing decisions; this is even more pertinent in the presence of congestion, as in [38]. The excellent performance of the greedy heuristic in our simulations further attests to the need for establishing its performance formally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This latter link is a "profitable" link for forwarding the Interest Packet at time slot t, from the standpoint of reducing delays and congestion. If either condition (i) or (ii) does not hold, then forward the Interest Packet on the link used by node n to forward the most recent Interest Packet for a chunk of object k. 10 If the head-of-the-queue Interest Packet at node n at time t is an interest for a chunk of data object k which is not the starting chunk, then forward the Interest Packet on the link used by node n to forward the most recent Interest Packet for a chunk of object k.…”
Section: Forwarding Of Interest Packetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in [12], authors suggest to forward Interests to the neighboring node that advertised the highest hit probability for the requested content object. A closer work to ours is [14], where an optimization framework is defined to jointly handle backpressure-based forwarding and LFU-like content placement. The work designs a control plane that feeds the actual chunk-level data plane with flow rates and queue sizes in order to operate optimal content placement and request forwarding.…”
Section: Caching and Forwarding Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%