The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8221-9_82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Violent Event Detection: An Approach Using Fusion GHOG-GIST Descriptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GHOG+GIST feature descriptor is a fusion of gradient and texture feature descriptor, the method used scale, magnitude and orientation and gives adequate result but compare to our proposed method GHOG+GIST features vector dimension is substantial and required large time computation cost. [35] 87.8 -HOF [35] 83.5 -HNF [35] 87.5 -LTP [35] 71.90±0.49 -ViF [23] 81.60±0.22 88.01 OViF [7] 84.20±3.33 90.32 ViF+OViF [7] 86.30±1.57 91.93 DiMOLIF [34] 88.6±1.2 93.23 GHOG+GIST [10] AUC HOG [35] 57.43±0.37 61.82 HOF [35] 58.53±0.32 57.60 HNF [35] 56.52±0.31 59.94 LTP [35] 71.53±0.17 79.86 ViF [23] 81.20±1.79 88.04 OViF [7] 76.80±3.90 80.47 ViF+OViF [7] 86.00±1.41 91.82 DiMOLIF [34] 85.83±4.2 89.25 GHOG+GIST [10] 88.86±5. In experimentation, our proposed features descriptor performed on an 8GB RAM, Intel core i7 computer running Windows 10.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…GHOG+GIST feature descriptor is a fusion of gradient and texture feature descriptor, the method used scale, magnitude and orientation and gives adequate result but compare to our proposed method GHOG+GIST features vector dimension is substantial and required large time computation cost. [35] 87.8 -HOF [35] 83.5 -HNF [35] 87.5 -LTP [35] 71.90±0.49 -ViF [23] 81.60±0.22 88.01 OViF [7] 84.20±3.33 90.32 ViF+OViF [7] 86.30±1.57 91.93 DiMOLIF [34] 88.6±1.2 93.23 GHOG+GIST [10] AUC HOG [35] 57.43±0.37 61.82 HOF [35] 58.53±0.32 57.60 HNF [35] 56.52±0.31 59.94 LTP [35] 71.53±0.17 79.86 ViF [23] 81.20±1.79 88.04 OViF [7] 76.80±3.90 80.47 ViF+OViF [7] 86.00±1.41 91.82 DiMOLIF [34] 85.83±4.2 89.25 GHOG+GIST [10] 88.86±5. In experimentation, our proposed features descriptor performed on an 8GB RAM, Intel core i7 computer running Windows 10.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we have presented our proposed texturebased features extraction technique performance. Five-fold cross-validation technique [7,10,34] have been used for experimentation. Consequently, for each one of the two datasets is separated into five halves.…”
Section: Experimentation Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations