“…The sex effect in the previous study (posterior mean: 1.515; CI: 0.178-2.921; pMCMC: 0.017 for skeletal elements, and posterior mean: 3.533; CI: 0.865-6.397; pMCMC: 0.002 for specimens) was more pronounced than in the present study (Table 2). Furthermore, a higher male than female cranial trauma prevalence is consistent with the common bioarchaeological finding that male skeletal remains are more likely to show injuries than female remains (Cohen et al, 2014;Fibiger et al, 2013;Jiménez-Brobeil et al, 2009;Larsen, 1997;Milner, Boldsen, Weise, Lauritsen, & Freund, 2015;Redfern, 2017b;Scaffidi & Tung, 2020;Schwitalla, Jones, Pilloud, Codding, & Wiberg, 2014;Standen et al, 2020;Walker, 2001), which might suggest that males exposed themselves more frequently to risky situations, such as physical confrontations, warfare, or risky leisure activities (Judd, 2017;Kwan, Cureton, Dozier, & Victorino, 2011;Martin et al, 2015;O'Jile, Ryan, Parks-Levy, Betz, & Gouvier, 2004;Redfern, 2017b;Sutherland, 2002). The observed, yet small, difference in cranial trauma prevalence between the sexes in our study might indicate different exposures to hazardous situations, for example, because of different behaviors or the involvement in different activities.…”