“…Some studies have solely examined indirect victimization (Kliewer et al, 2006; Kliewer & Murrelle, 2007), others have focused only on direct victimization (Brady, Tschann, Pasch, Flores, & Ozer, 2009; Simantov, Schoen, & Klein, 2000), and some have combined indirect and direct victimization into a single measure of victimization (Buka et al, 2001; Thompson, Sims, Kingree, & Windle, 2008). The few studies that have examined both forms of victimization typically assess the impact of each independently (Albus, Weist, & Perez-Smith, 2004; Berenson, Wiemann, & McCombs, 2001; O'Donnell, Schwab-Stone, & Muyeed, 2002; Taylor & Kliewer, 2006; Vermeiren, Schwab-Stone, Deboutte, Leckman, & Ruchkin, 2003) and have rarely assessed the unique or relative effects of each of these different victimization experiences (but see Acosta, Albus, Reynolds, Spriggs, & Weist, 2001; Fowler, Tompsett, Braciszewski, Jacques-Tiura, & Baltes, 2009; Sullivan et al, 2007). Despite Agnew's (2002) suggestion that different victimization experiences should be controlled for simultaneously in statistical analyses to prevent overestimating the effects of one form of victimization, empirical studies have largely failed to do so.…”