Violence against Emergency Department nurses; Can we identify the perpetrators?

Abstract

Introduction Violence against health care workers is a major issue in health care organisations and is estimated to affect 95% of workers, presenting an enormous risk for workers and employers. Current interventions generally aim at managing rather than preventing or minimising violent incidents. To create better-targeted interventions, it has been suggested to shift attention to the perpetrators of violence. The aim of this study was to identify and discuss the perceptions, held by Emergency Department nurses, about perpetrators of occupational violence and aggression. Methods Two focus groups were conducted with Emergency Department nurses at a major metropolitan hospital in Australia. In the focus groups, the nurses' perceptions about perpetrators of violence against health care workers were identified and discussed. The results were analysed using descriptive analysis. Results This study confirmed that violence is a major issue for Emergency Department nurses and has a considerable impact on them. Participants acknowledged that violence at work had become an intrinsic part of their job and they tend to focus on coping mechanisms. The nurses identified six overlapping groups of perpetrators and described their approach to dealing with these perpetrators. The results highlighted additional factors that impact on the occurrence and management of violence, such as the presence of security, wait times, and the triage system. Conclusions Based on the focus groups with Emergency Department nurses we conclude that violence at work is an everyday danger for Emergency Department nurses, who feel vulnerable and

Dilemmas and Repercussions of Workplace Violence against Emergency Nurses: A Qualitative Study

“…This is evidenced by the results in an earlier study that near one-third of victims of WPV had reduced confidence on the job [ 57 ]. This notion has also been demonstrated to be associated with under-reporting of violent incidents and a wrong judgment about violent situation and resources needed to mitigate WPV [ 1 , 58 ]. Furthermore, one of the most commonly reported consequences of WPV in any forms were frustration (one physical specific event = 45.8%, one physical ongoing event = 57.4%, one non-physical violence, combining threats, sexual harassment, and verbal abuse = 60.7%) [ 59 ].…”

Examining the utility of the Violence Prevention Climate scale: In a metropolitan Australian general hospital

“…Patients who present to emergency in need of services for these presentations have a unique set of needs, which are very different from those with physical illness, and can be challenging for emergency staff to diagnose and manage. The lack of access to and long wait times for specialist drug and alcohol, and mental health assessment in the emergency department is a recognised catalyst for violence (Spelten et al, 2020). The incorporation of specific liaison drug and alcohol/mental health services into ED models of care, whether in the form of a liaison role (e.g.…”

Effects of Integrated Workplace Violence Management Intervention on Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy, Goal Commitment, Attitudes, and Confidence in Emergency Department Nurses: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

“…There is a large body of evidence indicating that nurses are particularly at risk from violence exposure [ 1 , 3 , 7 , 9 , 10 ]. In EDs, 77% of staff reported experience of WPV [ 11 ].…”