2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14225894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vine Canopy Reconstruction and Assessment with Terrestrial Lidar and Aerial Imaging

Abstract: For successful dosing of plant protection products, the characteristics of the vine canopies should be known, based on which the spray amount should be dosed. In the field experiment, we compared two optical experimental methods, terrestrial lidar and aerial photogrammetry, with manual defoliation of some selected vines. Like those of other authors, our results show that both terrestrial lidar and aerial photogrammetry were able to represent the canopy well with correlation coefficients around 0.9 between the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increase in driving time, the error gradually accumulates, which will cause significant positioning errors [12]. Therefore, researchers have integrated positioning sensors such as machine vision, ultrasonic and sensors LiDAR into relative positioning methods [12,40,41]. It will provide fusion positioning for relative positioning methods, thereby improving positioning accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increase in driving time, the error gradually accumulates, which will cause significant positioning errors [12]. Therefore, researchers have integrated positioning sensors such as machine vision, ultrasonic and sensors LiDAR into relative positioning methods [12,40,41]. It will provide fusion positioning for relative positioning methods, thereby improving positioning accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR and SfM point clouds have distinct characteristics that impact their suitability for vineyard plant phenotyping, and several studies compared the accuracy of the two point clouds. In one study (Madec et al, 2017), both UAV-based SfM and ground-based LiDAR showed comparable accuracy in wheat crop height determination, while another (Petrovićet al, 2022) showed SfM point cloud superior accuracy in representing grapevine canopies due to its higher data density capture based on ground sampling distance. The affordability of RGB cameras compared to LiDAR has sparked interest, leading to numerous studies utilizing SfM-derived point clouds to estimate vineyard parameters (De Castro et al, 2018;Matese and Di Gennaro, 2018;Jurado et al, 2020;Padua et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR and SfM point clouds have distinct characteristics that impact their suitability for vineyard plant phenotyping, and several studies compared the accuracy of the two point clouds. In one study ( Madec et al., 2017 ), both UAV-based SfM and ground-based LiDAR showed comparable accuracy in wheat crop height determination, while another ( Petrović et al., 2022 ) showed SfM point cloud superior accuracy in representing grapevine canopies due to its higher data density capture based on ground sampling distance. The affordability of RGB cameras compared to LiDAR has sparked interest, leading to numerous studies utilizing SfM-derived point clouds to estimate vineyard parameters ( De Castro et al., 2018 ; Matese and Di Gennaro, 2018 ; Jurado et al., 2020 ; Pádua et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%