2004
DOI: 10.11141/ia.16.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Views of Carnac: Applications of Visibility Analysis and Dynamic Visualisation for Understanding the Neolithic Monuments of Southern Brittany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11,14,21,22,33,40]). However, whilst VRML files can be made available over the Internet, the visual quality of such scenes is frequently poor compared to that of even the most basic PC or console video game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,14,21,22,33,40]). However, whilst VRML files can be made available over the Internet, the visual quality of such scenes is frequently poor compared to that of even the most basic PC or console video game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visibility analyses have not yet been conducted on the megalithic sites in our study area. The few studies performed in Brittany (López‐Romero, 2008a, 2008b; Roughley & Shell, 2004) highlighted the role of intervisibility in the organisation of Neolithic landscapes (López‐Romero, 2008b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collision of post-processual landscape studies with the practice of GIS and other digital visualization technologies stimulated a great burgeoning of applications that claimed to subvert or transcend the gaze (e.g. Cummings, 2000;Gillings and Goodrick, 1996;Mills, 2000;Roughley and Shell, 2004;Wheatley, 1996). This article asks where next for the critique of visuality and visualization in archaeology?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%