2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-08390-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viewport-adaptive 360-degree video coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5. illustrates the performance comparison between the state-of-the-art [22], [42], [44] 1 works and the VPred-SCNN + LQAOSCNN. It is evident that the proposed variant outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of perceptual compression efficiency, however it remains computationally complex.…”
Section: B Coding Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 5. illustrates the performance comparison between the state-of-the-art [22], [42], [44] 1 works and the VPred-SCNN + LQAOSCNN. It is evident that the proposed variant outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of perceptual compression efficiency, however it remains computationally complex.…”
Section: B Coding Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aforementioned state-of-the-art researches, perceptually suffer losses resulting from the inaccurate prediction of QERs in the ERP 2 . Furthermore, other than Hu et al [44] 3 , both Sreedhar et al [42] and TSP [22] show inconsistent gains and heavy losses (up to 10.15 dB and 12.52 dB respectively) in viewport quality due to the application of re-sampling and re-packaging of poorly predicted QERs in their methodologies. Moreover, the 35% compression performance achieved for CourgarsTreats sequences by TSP [22] comes at perceptual quality loss of 5.47dB.…”
Section: B Coding Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations