1993
DOI: 10.2307/4002270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viewpoint: Trend Assessment by Similarity: A Demonstration

Abstract: Methodology for assessing trend in range condition is still evolving. This paper demonstrates use of Dice's community similarity coefficient, 2a/(2a + b + c), with communities present at 3 times and a notional community as a goal. Coefficients range from 0 (indicating a complete lack of similarity) to 1 (indicating complete similarity). Similarity is classed as low (0-0.25), moderate (0.26-0.50), high (0.51-0.79, or full (0.76-1). Study of time-goal coeffrcent graphs is suggested for deciding whether trend is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…SG were consumed more frequently in domestic cattle absence, whereas when domestic cattle was presented, the ingest of this lifeform decreases and the intake of HD and Gr increases (Figure 2). This agrees with what was before described about the guanaco diet in Tierra del Fuego, 8,16,19,29,31,32 in arid and semiarid areas of the Patagonia. [34][35][36][37][38] Table 2 Comparison of the vegetal composition of the three studied communities, using the Sörensen Index.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…SG were consumed more frequently in domestic cattle absence, whereas when domestic cattle was presented, the ingest of this lifeform decreases and the intake of HD and Gr increases (Figure 2). This agrees with what was before described about the guanaco diet in Tierra del Fuego, 8,16,19,29,31,32 in arid and semiarid areas of the Patagonia. [34][35][36][37][38] Table 2 Comparison of the vegetal composition of the three studied communities, using the Sörensen Index.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…If the SI coefficient is higher than 0.75 it is considered to reflect very high similarity, values in the range between 0.51 and 0.75 reflect high similarity, and values between 0.26 and 0.50 describe moderate similarity. Low similarity is described by values below 0.25 (Ratliff 1993). We calculated similarity for five groups of plants: total, exotic, dune obligate, grassland and mesic species.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Una baja contribución al SI indica completa falta de similitud (no hay especies o valores en común) por otro lado, una contribución alta al SI indica completa similitud (todas las especies o valores son comunes) y por lo tanto, un tipo de planta específica o especie es usada según la disponibilidad (Ratliff, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Low contribution to SI indicate complete lack of similarity (there are no common species or values) whereas a high contribution to SI indicate complete similarity (all species or values are common) and therefore a specific plant type or species is used according to its availability (Ratliff, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%