1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-3840.1978.1104_865.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viewing the Bible Belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The South, consisting of south Atlantic and east and west south‐central states, bears on average the greatest support for theocracy and opposition to ecology, whereas the West, consisting of mountain and Pacific states, has the strongest opposition to theocracy and moderate support for ecology, similar to the Northeast, consisting of New England and the mid‐Atlantic states. The results for theocracy are broadly similar to those from other regional studies of U.S. religiosity (Zelinsky 1961; Shortridge 1976; Tweedie 1978), yet slightly different from studies of civil religion (Stump 1985). Though few published studies reveal U.S. spatial patterns of environmentalism or trust in science, results for ecology are unsurprising in suggesting that the strongest support is found on the east and west coasts.…”
Section: Regional and Cross‐national Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The South, consisting of south Atlantic and east and west south‐central states, bears on average the greatest support for theocracy and opposition to ecology, whereas the West, consisting of mountain and Pacific states, has the strongest opposition to theocracy and moderate support for ecology, similar to the Northeast, consisting of New England and the mid‐Atlantic states. The results for theocracy are broadly similar to those from other regional studies of U.S. religiosity (Zelinsky 1961; Shortridge 1976; Tweedie 1978), yet slightly different from studies of civil religion (Stump 1985). Though few published studies reveal U.S. spatial patterns of environmentalism or trust in science, results for ecology are unsurprising in suggesting that the strongest support is found on the east and west coasts.…”
Section: Regional and Cross‐national Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…22 This is true especially in Deep South states such as Alabama and Mississippi, which are a part of the so-called Bible Belt. 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical colonial dominance of the coastal area by Spanish missionaries and Catholic French and Catholic Canadian 18 settlers still influences the southern coastal region. The northern region was influenced by Protestant itinerate preachers and missionaries and settlers from the central and east coast once Louisiana became a state and has been designated by many as part of the Bible Belt (Tweedlie 1978;Zelinsky 1972). As populations shift, so will the religious mix in the central and northern parts of the state.…”
Section: Faith-inspired Models For Changementioning
confidence: 99%