Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3173621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viewer Experience of Obscuring Scene Elements in Photos to Enhance Privacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that blurring improves quantitiy of recalled details, but does not improve the accuracy of recall. Although blurring for obfuscation is commonly used in research [7,13] and industry (e.g., Google Street View), we cannot make claims about the impact of other techniques on memory recall. We plan to compare in the impact of obfuscation in explicit photo capturing contexts such as taking selfies.…”
Section: Lesson Learnt: Ambiguous Lifelogs Might Distort Memoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that blurring improves quantitiy of recalled details, but does not improve the accuracy of recall. Although blurring for obfuscation is commonly used in research [7,13] and industry (e.g., Google Street View), we cannot make claims about the impact of other techniques on memory recall. We plan to compare in the impact of obfuscation in explicit photo capturing contexts such as taking selfies.…”
Section: Lesson Learnt: Ambiguous Lifelogs Might Distort Memoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous works (e.g., [7,13]) investigated the impact of obfuscation on privacy protection and user experience, it remains unclear how obfuscation impacts the recall of memories. Closing this gap is crucial as recalling memories is one of the main motivations behind lifelogging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computed blur thresholds and classification rate determine that blur is effective at increasing privacy while retaining utility, but that the trade-off must be evaluated across applications and sensors. Hasan et al [34] investigated various image filters such as masking, blurring, and pixelation with respect to their effectiveness in obscuring specific features of the content as well as retaining the utility and aesthetics of the photograph. They reported that blur was effective at obscuring the gender of the photographed person, though not so much the ethnicity or expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is to fully or partially obfuscate sensitive imagery (photo/video) elements [55,61,78,105] or user attributes [25,115,117]. Obfuscating attributes, however, may not be effective against inference 4 attacks [25].…”
Section: Obfuscationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, increasing both the size of masked area and the pixelation level of deterioration led to lower human recognition rates. More recently, Hasan et al [55] weighed users' perception of both privacy and utility of five privacy filters that were applied with a different strength (resulting in a total of 11 filters) to obscure an object in photos. Utility in this context measured the aesthetics and overall user satisfaction with content viewing experience [55].…”
Section: Obfuscationmentioning
confidence: 99%