2014
DOI: 10.2514/1.t4337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

View Factors Between Disk/Rectangle and Rectangle in Parallel and Perpendicular Planes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the identical geometry, Gemaque et al [14] derived equations using area integration. For disk/rectangle and rectangle in parallel and perpendicular configurations, which are similar to the present configurations of the cone calorimetry, Abishek et al [22] derived formulae using contour integration, demonstrating further detailed processes of derivation. In these previous studies, however, either little information was provided as to how the algebraic complexities of double (or quadruple) integrations of differential-element view factors were solved, or it was still non-transferable to finding the factor between segment of interior of truncated cone and perimeter surface in perpendicular configuration.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the identical geometry, Gemaque et al [14] derived equations using area integration. For disk/rectangle and rectangle in parallel and perpendicular configurations, which are similar to the present configurations of the cone calorimetry, Abishek et al [22] derived formulae using contour integration, demonstrating further detailed processes of derivation. In these previous studies, however, either little information was provided as to how the algebraic complexities of double (or quadruple) integrations of differential-element view factors were solved, or it was still non-transferable to finding the factor between segment of interior of truncated cone and perimeter surface in perpendicular configuration.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Methods of evaluating view factors have evolved to improve the accuracy, algebraic simplification and computational efficiency in various fields of engineering [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. While integrating differential-element view factors over finite areas, Hamilton and Morgan [17] realised algebraic complexities, and initiated the use of Stokes' theorem to simplify their eventual solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%