The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1996
DOI: 10.1177/154193129604002417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VIEW: A Visualization-Based Mental Model Elicitation Workstation

Abstract: We describe a Visualization and Interactive Elicitation Workstation (VIEW) prototype, developed to support knowledge elicitation (KE) and mental model research and designed to meet five key objectives: 1) capturing both explicit and implicit knowledge; 2) providing perceptually-rich elicitation stimuli; 3) minimizing KE-imposed distortions; 4) supporting a variety of techniques to capture the range of Structures comprising the expert's mental model; and 5) capturing the expert's movement within and among these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VIEW is a knowledge elicitation workstation developed at Charles River Analytics (Hudlicka et al, 1999) which provides an integrated toolkit for interactive, visualization-based knowledge elicitation. VIEW supports both direct KE methods (e.g., protocol analysis, critical decision method, inferential analysis, etc.)…”
Section: Existing Relevant Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VIEW is a knowledge elicitation workstation developed at Charles River Analytics (Hudlicka et al, 1999) which provides an integrated toolkit for interactive, visualization-based knowledge elicitation. VIEW supports both direct KE methods (e.g., protocol analysis, critical decision method, inferential analysis, etc.)…”
Section: Existing Relevant Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The domain characterization (a partial ontological analysis), yielded the cues, situations, and actions summarized in table 3.2.2.1-1 and figure 3.2.2.1-1. For a more extensive elicitation effort required for a Phase II, other methods would be used, including repertory grid analysis, which has been shown to be an efficient method for eliciting large numbers of individual knowledge constructs and schema components (Hudlicka, 1996;Hudlicka et al, 1999).…”
Section: Identifying the Task Domain Situation Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%