Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Measurements Up the Stack 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2018602.2018608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vienna surfing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important aspect was determined to be the system's efficiency. In [11], the authors conducted MBB measurements over a three-week period in Vienna, Austria. They used two MBB services, online browsing and file downloads, which were exploited in the background via traffic shaping.…”
Section: Related Studies and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important aspect was determined to be the system's efficiency. In [11], the authors conducted MBB measurements over a three-week period in Vienna, Austria. They used two MBB services, online browsing and file downloads, which were exploited in the background via traffic shaping.…”
Section: Related Studies and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, Web sites adapted for mobile access take into account not only design aspects (for example, responsive Web design [75], but aim to reduce loading times (for example, including fewer media components such as pictures or videos, or those of lower resolution) [32], since today users use their mobile devices in different contexts and environments, with increased performance expectations leading to decreased delay tolerance. There exist numerous Internet posts giving suggestions and advice on how to decrease waiting time in the mobile Web context, while several studies have addressed the impact of waiting time on user experience in the mobile context [5,47,59,95,103,104,116,133].…”
Section: System Influence Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Web site loading time and number of taps respectively in that order differ in the degree to which they impact this perception of Web site loading time Number of taps, aesthetics of Web site, Web site loading time, and quality of Web site information respectively in that order differ in the degree to which they impact perceived usability Aesthetics of a Web site, number of taps, and quality of Web site information respectively in that order differ in the degree to which they impact the perception of aesthetics Quality of Web site information, aesthetics of Web site, and number of taps to reach desired Web content respectively in that order differ in the degree to which they impact the perception of quality of Web site information CPU central processing unit, HCI human computer interaction, PLT page load time, QoE quality of experience done by Reichl et al [93], Schatz and Egger [103], or Schatz et al [105]. The former approach enables researchers to exactly control waiting times as one of the main IFs, while the latter guarantees a more realistic web browsing experience for the user.…”
Section: Conclusion IImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, lab experiments miss out many important QoE influence factors such as usage context, content preferences by individual users, or device usability among others, potentially introducing differences w.r.t. evaluations conducted in the field [6]. Field trial experiments place the end-user and the evaluated components (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%