Video Standards for Rhinoplasty Education: A Review and Recommended Guidelines

Hakimi, Amir A.; Prasad, Karthik; Hong, Ellen M; Standiford, Lauren; Chang, Edward T.; Cobo, Roxana; Jang, Yong Ju; Wong, Brian J. F.

doi:10.1089/fpsam.2020.0006

Cited by 9 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…), selected initial propositions based on personal experience, video guidelines of major journals, and a literature review. 3,5,10,[12][13][14][15][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] A Delphi questionnaire was created, and the propositions were reviewed online by the entire consensus committee in three rounds. Blinded feedback was shared among respondents between each round, and the respondents were able to suggest new propositions at the end of round 1.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A steering subcommittee comprised of five YO‐IFOS members ( f.s., s.p., j.m., n.f., n.t. ), selected initial propositions based on personal experience, video guidelines of major journals, and a literature review 3,5,10,12–15,17–23 . A Delphi questionnaire was created, and the propositions were reviewed online by the entire consensus committee in three rounds.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

IVORY Guidelines (Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO‐IFOS): A Consensus on Surgical Videos in Ear, Nose, and Throat

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives/Hypothesis: Otolaryngology instructional videos available online are often of poor quality. The objective of this article was to establish international consensus recommendations for the production of educational surgical videos in otolaryngology. Study Design: DELPHI survey. Methods: Twenty-seven international respondents participated in this study from 12 countries. Consensus was reached after three rounds of questionnaires following the Delphi methodology. The proposals having reached the 80% agreement threshold in the third round were retained. Results: The main recommendations are as follows: 1) Ethics: patients must be anonymized and unrecognizable (apart from plastic surgery if necessary). A signed authorization must be obtained if the person is recognizable. 2) Technical aspects: videos should be edited and in high-definition (HD) quality if possible. Narration or subtitles and didactic illustrations are recommended. 3) Case presentation: name of pathology and procedure must be specified; the case should be presented with relevant workup. 4) Surgery: surgical procedures should be divided into several distinct stages and include tips and pitfalls. Pathology should be shown if relevant. Key points should be detailed at the end of the procedure. 5) Organ-specific: type of approach and bilateral audiometry should be specified in otology. Coronal plane computed tomography scans should be shown in endonasal surgery. It is recommended to show pre-and postoperative videos in voice surgery and preoperative drawings and photos of scars in plastic surgery, as well as the ventilation method in airway surgery.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

IVORY Guidelines (Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO‐IFOS): A Consensus on Surgical Videos in Ear, Nose, and Throat

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The advantages of video over photography in residency training have been recognized by surgical educational programs for years due to the rapid presentation of procedural and anatomical details in a real surgical environment that is technically informative. [15][16][17] This may help explain the greater degree of video adoption in academics compared to the private setting as well as the younger surgeons' greater tendency toward video adoption and proficient relative to their more senior colleagues. Some limitations of this study are worth recognizing, which include a small sample size that may not fully represent the habits and perspectives of the entire specialty in general, as well as participation bias relating to the electronic dissemination and administration of the survey.…”

Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Future of Visual Documentation? Assessing the Use of Videography in Facial Plastic Surgery

Soares

Yamamoto

Liebertz³

2022

Facial Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Recent technological advancements in the field of portable electronics have facilitated the use of videography as a form of visual documentation in facial plastic surgery. Currently, the degree of video adoption and perceptions relating to its use in plastic surgery are not known. Objective: To evaluate the current use, perceptions, and barriers regarding the adoption of video in the clinical practice of facial plastic surgery. Methods: A cross-sectional study of all AAFPRS members was conducted through an email-disseminated 24-item online survey. Results: A total of 164 surgeons responded to the survey. Nearly all of surgeons reported routinely employing photography for the documentation and marketing of surgical results. Fewer than 25% of respondents acknowledged using video to document surgical outcomes. Younger surgeons (< 10 years in practice) and those in academic practices were significantly more likely to adopt videography (32% vs 17%, p = 0.042 and 38% vs 18%, p = 0.027, respectively). Most surgeons regarded video as the superior visual documentation format for dynamic facial expression and as more difficult to deceptively manipulate. Most frequently cited barriers to adoption included time-consuming capture, file editing/storage requirements, and lack of clear standards. Conclusions: Videography holds favorable potential as the future format of visual documentation in facial plastic surgery due to its ability to capture the full range of dynamic facial expression. Establishing standards and setup guidelines for video capture will be essential in increasing its adoption.

show abstract

“…Rhinoplasty is an especially challenging operation to record as the fine nasal anatomy is restricted to a narrow surgical field with limited sightlines. 2…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rhinoplasty is an especially challenging operation to record as the fine nasal anatomy is restricted to a narrow surgical field with limited sightlines. 2 Numerous techniques for acquiring intraoperative rhinoplasty footage have been described including the use of camcorders, action cameras, exoscopes, and smartphones which can be handheld, suspended to overhead lighting, affixed to headlamps, or enclosed within sterile plastic bags. [3][4][5] However, these options are often costly, uncomfortable for the surgeon, or unable to capture high quality footage from the desirable frontal vantage point.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%