2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video-oculographic measures of eye movement control in the smooth pursuit neck torsion test can classify idiopathic neck pain patients from healthy individuals: A datamining based diagnostic accuracy study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reliable and valid SPNTT protocol [ 5 , 6 , 26 ] was conducted as described in the study by Majcen Rosker et al [ 6 ]. Tracking of a horizontally moving target was performed at three different neck positions: facing forward (the trunk and head were in a neutral position), right neck torsion at 45° and left neck torsion at 45°.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable and valid SPNTT protocol [ 5 , 6 , 26 ] was conducted as described in the study by Majcen Rosker et al [ 6 ]. Tracking of a horizontally moving target was performed at three different neck positions: facing forward (the trunk and head were in a neutral position), right neck torsion at 45° and left neck torsion at 45°.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to alterations in proprioceptive information discussed above, sensory mismatch can be present in patients with neck pain as a result of functional adaptations in visual and vestibular systems 39 , 40 . Butterfly test requires tracking an unpredictably moving target of constantly changing velocity, acceleration and direction of movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing protocol consisted of four horizontal SPNT tests of which characteristics were based on previous studies (Majcen Rosker et al 2021 , 2022d ); (i) tracking a predictable cyclic sinusoidal target movement with 40° target movement amplitude and 30°s −1 target movement velocity (predictable SPNT test), (ii) tracking a sinusoidal target movement with changing target movement amplitude ranging from 30° to 50° amplitude at constant velocity of 30°s −1 SPNT test (unpredictably changing amplitude), (iii) tracking a sinusoidal target movement with changing target movement velocity ranging from 20 to 40°s −1 at a constant target movement amplitude of 30° (unpredictably changing velocity) and (iv) a sinusoidal target movement with changing of amplitude (from 30° to 50° amplitude) and velocity (from 20 to 40°s −1 ) (unpredictably changing amplitude and velocity—unpredictable task).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%