Video laryngoscopy for out of hospital cardiac arrest

Huebinger, Ryan M.; Stilgenbauer, Hutch; Jarvis, Jeff; Ostermayer, Daniel; Schulz, Kurt S.; Wang, Henry E.

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.031

Cited by 16 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Risse et al 11 reported on a study conducted on German paramedics and found that there was no significant difference in the success rate comparison between VL (Glidescope®) and direct viewing laryngoscope (75% and 68.1%, respectively) ( P = 0.63). In addition, Huebinger et al 12 reported a study conducted on paramedics in the United States and found that there was a significant difference in the success rate between VL (80.8%) and direct viewing laryngoscope (73.1%) (95% CI6.4%-9.0%, P < 0.001) and that the increased ROSC rate was not related to the use of VL (aOR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9–1.1).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A comparative study of Video laryngoscope vs Macintosh laryngoscope for prehospital tracheal intubation in Hiroshima, Japan

Santou¹,

Ueta²,

Nakagawa³

et al. 2023

Resuscitation Plus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Comparative studies of tracheal intubation with ML and VL include a study report by a physician at a medical institution 9 and a study report by a mannequin. 10 However, comp parative studies by prehospital EMTs have been reported in the United States 11 and Europe, 12 but not in Japan.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study of Video laryngoscope vs Macintosh laryngoscope for prehospital tracheal intubation in Hiroshima, Japan

Santou¹,

Ueta²,

Nakagawa³

et al. 2023

Resuscitation Plus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Two were randomized control trials (2013 Guyette, 2017 Ducharme), one was a prospective study (2020 Garcia-Pintos), and four were retrospective studies (2015 Jarvis, 2018 Louka, 2021 Huebinger, 2021 Lenz). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Three studies enrolled fewer than 100 patients (2017 Ducharme, 2018 Louka, 2020 Garcia-Pintos), while the 2021 Huebinger study involved a large population (22,132 patients). [15][16][17]20 In all the studies, a total of 6,674 patients underwent intubation via VL and 17,279 patients underwent DL (Table 1).…”

Section: Study Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Three studies enrolled fewer than 100 patients (2017 Ducharme, 2018 Louka, 2020 Garcia-Pintos), while the 2021 Huebinger study involved a large population (22,132 patients). [15][16][17]20 In all the studies, a total of 6,674 patients underwent intubation via VL and 17,279 patients underwent DL (Table 1). Fourteen of 21 studies reported the outcomes of interest but were excluded because they used cadaver 21 or manikin conduits and not living adult patients.…”

Section: Study Descriptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of Video Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the Prehospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pourmand

Terrebonne

Gerber

et al. 2022

Prehosp. Disaster med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Placing an endotracheal tube is a life-saving measure. Direct laryngoscopy (DL) is traditionally the default method. Video laryngoscopy (VL) has been shown to improve efficiency, but there is insufficient evidence comparing VL versus DL in the prehospital settings. This study, comprising a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis, assesses current literature for the efficacy of VL in prehospital settings. Methods: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from their beginnings through March 1, 2022 for eligible studies. Outcomes were the ﬁrst successful intubation, overall success rate, and number of total DL versus VL attempts in real-life clinical situations. Cochrane’s Risk of Bias (RoB) tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were applied to assess risk of bias and study quality; Q-statistics and I2 values were used to assess heterogeneity. Results: The search yielded seven studies involving 23,953 patients, 6,674 (28%) of whom underwent intubation via VL. Compared to DL, VL was associated with a statistically higher risk ratio for first-pass success (Risk Ratio [RR] = 1.116; 95% CI, 1.005-1.239; P = .041; I2 = 87%). The I2 value for the subgroup of prospective studies was 0% compared to 89% for retrospective studies. In addition, VL was associated with higher likelihood of overall success rate (RR = 1.097; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18; P = .021; I2 = 85%) and lower mean number of attempts (Mean Difference = -0.529; 95% CI, -0.922 to -0.137; P = .008). Conclusion: The meta-analysis suggested that VL was associated with higher likelihood of achieving first-pass success, greater overall success rate, and lower number of intubation attempts for adults in the prehospital settings. This study had high heterogeneity, likely presenced by the inclusion of retrospective observational studies. Further studies with more rigorous methodology are needed to confirm these results.

show abstract

“…Data from US EMS records comparing VL (n = 5702) with direct laryngoscopy (n = 16,430) for OHCA found that VL as associated with a higher first pass success than DL (75.1% v 69.5%, p < 0.001) but there was no difference in ROSC > 20 min. 48 Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) during CPR…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%