2020
DOI: 10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video Cartoons and Task-Induced Involvement: Effects to Pupils’ L2 Incidental Literacy Acquisition

Abstract: While most studies that explored children’s incidental literacy acquisition focused on input from written text, this quantitative-qualitative study investigated the effects of using audio-visual input through close-captioned Aesop’s Fables cartoons from PinkFong and Task-Induced Involvement (n=6 eight-year old pupils). Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test reveals that there is a significant difference in the pretest, immediate posttest and delayed posttests scores after the intervention as shown in the 90%-95% confidence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One high‐quality study (Appendix I) by Arabiana et al (2020), explored the use of close‐captioned cartoons, and the effects on four literacy skills: vocabulary, oral vocabulary and pronunciation, orthographic skill, and comprehension. This was conducted with six grade 2 students in a public school in the Philippines.…”
Section: Discussion: Types Of Educational Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One high‐quality study (Appendix I) by Arabiana et al (2020), explored the use of close‐captioned cartoons, and the effects on four literacy skills: vocabulary, oral vocabulary and pronunciation, orthographic skill, and comprehension. This was conducted with six grade 2 students in a public school in the Philippines.…”
Section: Discussion: Types Of Educational Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests a research gap: although the ILH has existed for more than 20 years, its application to children’s L2 vocabulary acquisition has been virtually nil due to the low number of studies found (i.e., k = 5) and the low WoE value of these five studies. For example, in Arabiana et al [ 31 ], the following problems emerged: the task description was not clear enough to calculate the IL; the researchers did not report how the vocabulary acquisition was measured and scored; the researchers did not mention the duration of the intervention; and the researchers did not mention where the research was conducted (for example, in a classroom, online, or at the student’s home).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%