2015
DOI: 10.4324/9781315677866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Victorian Spectacular Theatre 1850–1910

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Archaeology thus directly shaped the Victorian theatre experience and suggested new ways of reading familiar plays. Michael R. Booth () has investigated the intimate relationship between stage historical dramas and archaeology—or what he calls “the archaeologising of spectacle” (p. 22). More recently, drawing from The Victorians and the Visual Imagination , in which Kate Flint () explores the “development of the visualization of experience,” Debbie Challis () describes the Greek Court at the Crystal Palace as “a good example of the desire to make the vision of antiquity corporeal and create an arena through which the past could be physically experienced and observed” (p. 54).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeology thus directly shaped the Victorian theatre experience and suggested new ways of reading familiar plays. Michael R. Booth () has investigated the intimate relationship between stage historical dramas and archaeology—or what he calls “the archaeologising of spectacle” (p. 22). More recently, drawing from The Victorians and the Visual Imagination , in which Kate Flint () explores the “development of the visualization of experience,” Debbie Challis () describes the Greek Court at the Crystal Palace as “a good example of the desire to make the vision of antiquity corporeal and create an arena through which the past could be physically experienced and observed” (p. 54).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No doubt, throughout the nineteenth century, the boundaries between melodrama and tragedy were murky, as melodramatic and sensational components regularly infiltrated tragic performances and texts. 21 For years, scholars have wrestled to assess the distinctions between these genres, and while in both the representation of suffering is a central component, melodrama is typically associated with a crude, exaggerated storyline and performance, in which, despite the victimising of virtue by villainy, the triumph of the righteous is inevitable. 22 The definitions of tragedy, however, are traditionally more dynamic and complex and may range from 'extremely sad' to 'a nexus of poetic components'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2Among a vast literature on nineteenth-century melodrama, see primarily Booth (1965), (1981), (1991) 150–61; Meisel (1983); Brooks (1995); Hays and Nikolopoulou (1996); Moody (2000). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%