2009
DOI: 10.1680/geot.ob.8.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Victor Froilano Bachmann de Mello

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the width of the building increases up to 10 m, the slope of the building does not change signi cantly. when the width increases from 10 m to 21 m, the slope increases, and structural damage to the building begins, which is in relatively good agreement with the criteria proposed by Burland et al (1977), Skempton and McDonald (1956). The tensile strain in relation to the width of the building has increased up to 21 m with a uniform slope, resulting in minor and aesthetic damage to the building.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When the width of the building increases up to 10 m, the slope of the building does not change signi cantly. when the width increases from 10 m to 21 m, the slope increases, and structural damage to the building begins, which is in relatively good agreement with the criteria proposed by Burland et al (1977), Skempton and McDonald (1956). The tensile strain in relation to the width of the building has increased up to 21 m with a uniform slope, resulting in minor and aesthetic damage to the building.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[42]; [37] and [43]. Terzaghi (1938), Burland et al, (1977) and Skempton and MacDonald (1956) gave an allowable slope of 0.004 to avoid structural damage, which is in relatively good agreement with the results of numerical modeling. For buildings wider than 21 m to 35 m, the changes in building slope increased with less intensity and reached 0.00675, causing Type 4 structural damage to the building.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Slopesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The adoption of piled raft foundations concept in the design of pile groups is by no means new, and has been described by several authors, including Zeevaert (1957), Davis andPoulos (1972), Hooper (1973), Burland et al (1977), Katzenbach and Reul (1997), Prakoso andKulhawy (2000), andReul andRandolph (2003), among many others. In the early years, because of the limited availability of computers memory and processing speed, the use of numerical methods was confined to simple problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%