2018
DOI: 10.1177/0011128718787513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Victimization, Fear of Crime, and Trust in Criminal Justice Institutions: A Cross-National Analysis

Abstract: Prior studies demonstrate that victimization and fear of crime independently affect criminal justice attitudes, but few have examined trust in criminal justice institutions. In addition, research has been primarily confined to the United States. Using data from the AmericasBarometer survey collected in the United States, Mexico, Argentina, and Brazil, the current study investigates the direct and indirect effects of criminal victimization and fear of crime on (a) perceived fairness of the courts, (b) trust in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we control for trust in the judicial system , that is, how much faith the respondent has that the judicial system would punish someone guilty of robbing or assaulting the respondent (1 = none , 4 = a lot ). We account for participants’ perceptions of crime victimization risk by controlling for whether respondents believe that they have trustworthy neighbors (1 = very untrustworthy , 4 = very trustworthy ) and the extent to which respondents perceive that they live in a safe neighborhood (1 = very unsafe , 4 = very safe ; see Singer et al, 2019). 5 Finally, to account for any between-country differences that might account for the observed effects, each of the regression models includes country fixed effects dummy variables with Brazil used as the reference group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, we control for trust in the judicial system , that is, how much faith the respondent has that the judicial system would punish someone guilty of robbing or assaulting the respondent (1 = none , 4 = a lot ). We account for participants’ perceptions of crime victimization risk by controlling for whether respondents believe that they have trustworthy neighbors (1 = very untrustworthy , 4 = very trustworthy ) and the extent to which respondents perceive that they live in a safe neighborhood (1 = very unsafe , 4 = very safe ; see Singer et al, 2019). 5 Finally, to account for any between-country differences that might account for the observed effects, each of the regression models includes country fixed effects dummy variables with Brazil used as the reference group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passengers who had already been the victims of crime on public transport seek for social presence more often. According to previous research (Singer et al, 2018), it may be assumed that passengers with victimization experience tend to estimate the risk of becoming a victim of crime again as more likely, feel less secure, and ultimately are more dependent on coping strategies. The direct negative effect of interpersonal trust on social presence sought (H5) was not supported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we expect people with a low level of interpersonal trust (Viklund, 2003) and those who have experienced victimization (Singer et al, 2018) on public transport to feel less secure, and therefore to be more dependent on coping strategies, we also hypothesize that these passengers seek more often for social presence.…”
Section: Research Question and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be argued that those who have been victims perceive higher chances of revictimization than those who have not directly faced a criminal act (Rühs et al., 2017). At the comparative perspective Singer, Cecilia, et al. (2019) show that while the direct effects of victimization are mixed across countries, FOC consistently mediates the effects of victimization on trust in criminal justice institutions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%