Victim satisfaction with restorative justice

Abstract

Evaluative studies have demonstrated that victims of crime are satisfied with their participation in a restorative intervention. Meanwhile, the explanation of victim satisfaction with restorative practices remains to be established. In this article, we study factors contributing to victim satisfaction with the restorative approach and ask to what extent victim satisfaction is simply due to procedural justice. Procedural justice theory predicts that the perceived fairness of a conflict resolution procedure is not only explained by the favourability of its outcome, but also by the appreciation of procedural factors, such as trust, neutrality, respect and voice, and that procedures can be assessed irrespective of their outcome. We conducted semi-directive interviews with 34 victims of violent crime who participated in victimÀoffender mediation, family group conferencing or victimÀoffender encounters in Canada and Belgium. We found that appreciation of a restorative approach is related to it being perceived as procedurally just. However, it is also related to other factors, namely the restorative approach being flexible, providing care, centring on dialogue and permitting pro-social motives to be addressed. These factors are not accounted for by the procedural justice model. Therefore, procedural justice partially but not entirely explains victim satisfaction with restorative practices.

Reconstruction Legal Culture of Madurese Based on Pancasila Values as Criminal Policy in Tackling Carok (Duel)

“…This adat-based solution to social problems is in line with the restorative justice concept. This is in line with Van Camp &Wemmers Opinion that stated the conception of the value in restorative justice is about healing and recognition of the involved parties, such as victim, offender, and community [8]. This study proposes the presence of the informal justice institution and named as the LMA.…”

Reconstructing the Treatment of Corruption Inmates in Indonesia’s Prisons

“…The weak management system of the Department of Corrections in Indonesia brings many obstacles in realizing the treatment concept, especially for corruption inmates. At least there are three main factors which used to categorize various obstacles in the treatment issues, [13] such as (1) structure of law, (2) the substance of law; and (3) legal culture.…”

Restorative Justice Conferencing as a ‘Holistic’ Process: Convenor Perspectives

“…Although victim satisfaction is considered one of the benefits of RJC, what factors lead to satisfaction with RJC remains less clear (Umbreit et al 2002;Vanfraechem and Aertsen 2010). Tyler (1990) and others (see Van Camp 2014) have suggested that the procedural processes of RJC play a large role in the satisfaction of participants in RJC, but to date there remains only a marginal amount of empirical research on this question. Armstrong (2012) interviewed 35 victims who participated in the RJC process in the United Kingdom ('UK') 4 about what factors they perceived to be important.…”