2021
DOI: 10.1177/0306624x211058950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Victim and Victim Support Staff Experiences of a Domestic Violence Electronic Monitoring Program in Australia

Abstract: This study investigates the experiences of victims of domestic violence (DV) involved in a bilateral electronic monitoring (EM) program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six victims whose associated person of interest participated in an EM program post-release, as well as 13 victim support staff. Thematic analysis revealed seven themes: (1) Safety and validation, (2) Initial anxiety, (3) Minimal intrusion on daily life, (4) Psychological relief and feelings of safety, (5) Freedom to engage in dai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the use of EM (Belur et al, 2020). In the context of IPV, the imposition of a PO with EM is considered effective in deterring the aggressor from approaching the victim and in preventing further attacks and even attempted homicides when these measures are in force (Arenas, 2016; Erez et al, 2012; Erez & Ibarra, 2007; Hwang et al, 2023; Otero, 2009). In turn, it helps victims to have a greater sense of security during the EM program, and more autonomy and confidence to carry out their daily activities (Arenas, 2016; Erez et al, 2012; Hwang et al, 2023).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of the Protective Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is the use of EM (Belur et al, 2020). In the context of IPV, the imposition of a PO with EM is considered effective in deterring the aggressor from approaching the victim and in preventing further attacks and even attempted homicides when these measures are in force (Arenas, 2016; Erez et al, 2012; Erez & Ibarra, 2007; Hwang et al, 2023; Otero, 2009). In turn, it helps victims to have a greater sense of security during the EM program, and more autonomy and confidence to carry out their daily activities (Arenas, 2016; Erez et al, 2012; Hwang et al, 2023).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of the Protective Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, EM used in pretrial in IPV cases may even increase the likelihood of conviction (Erez et al, 2012). There are also victims of IPV who refuse to use the EM for different reasons (Erez et al, 2012; Hwang et al, 2023; Otero, 2009): those who are highly anxious about receiving alert calls from the control centre or those who do not want to be controlled either by third parties or by the aggressor (knowing the exclusion zones tells them where the victim is moving around).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of the Protective Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%