1995
DOI: 10.1121/1.413808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrotactile forward masking: Effects of the amplitude and duration of the masking stimulus

Abstract: Tactile thresholds for detecting a 50-ms signal presented 25 ms after the termination of a masking stimulus increased as a function of the amplitude level and duration of the masking stimulus. The effects were similar in both the P and NP I channels measured at 250 and 20 Hz, respectively. It was concluded that the increased masking caused by increasing the duration of the masking stimulus resulted from processes other than or in addition to temporal integration--the latter being a characteristic of the P, but… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average slope (0.383) of the masking functions was smaller than the average slope (0.745) of a previous study (Gü çlü and Bolanowski 2005a). The slope shows the masking efficiency (Gescheider et al 1995), which suggests that the P-channel thresholds of the current HSs were affected less as a function of the masking level. However, this does not mean that the masking effect was not present, for a range of 17-52 dB SL masking level, the thresholds shifted up by 4-24 dB in the overall data.…”
Section: Forward Maskingcontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…The average slope (0.383) of the masking functions was smaller than the average slope (0.745) of a previous study (Gü çlü and Bolanowski 2005a). The slope shows the masking efficiency (Gescheider et al 1995), which suggests that the P-channel thresholds of the current HSs were affected less as a function of the masking level. However, this does not mean that the masking effect was not present, for a range of 17-52 dB SL masking level, the thresholds shifted up by 4-24 dB in the overall data.…”
Section: Forward Maskingcontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…We specifically focused on the P channel because of its high sensitivity and relatively sharp frequency tuning, which makes it easier to isolate for vibrotactile detection Zwislocki 1984a, 1984b;Bensmaia et al 2005;Gescheider et al 2005;Güçlü et al 2005Güçlü et al , 2006Güçlü and Ö ztek 2007;Pawson et al 2009;Yıldız and Güçlü 2013). By applying forward masking to elevate the thresholds of the P channel, the effects of suprathreshold stimuli can also be studied (Gescheider et al 1995;Güçlü and Bolanowski 2005a;Güçlü and Ö ztek 2007). Moreover, the P channel is particularly suited for the detection of vibrations transmitted through grasped objects (Brisben et al 1999), which may also involve daily situations influenced by movement-related gating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of delivering an adapting stimulus on the perception of subsequent test stimuliparticularly the reduction in sensation -has been characterized in some detail (Delemos and Hollins, 1996;Gescheider et al, 1995;Goble and Hollins, 1993;Laskin and Spencer, 1979;Tommerdahl et al, 2005a;Verrillo and Gescheider, 1977). Many psychophysical studies have reported that the presentation of an adapting stimulus causes an increase in the detection threshold, and thus a reduction in the perceived intensity, of a subsequent stimulus (for review see (Gescheider et al, 1995;Goble and Hollins, 1993;Verrillo, 1985;Verrillo and Gescheider, 1977)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many psychophysical studies have reported that the presentation of an adapting stimulus causes an increase in the detection threshold, and thus a reduction in the perceived intensity, of a subsequent stimulus (for review see (Gescheider et al, 1995;Goble and Hollins, 1993;Verrillo, 1985;Verrillo and Gescheider, 1977)). More specifically, Gescheider et al showed that the threshold shift which occurred after the presentation of an adapting stimulus increased systematically with adapting stimulus duration (Gescheider et al, 1995). Fewer studies, however, have examined the impact of an adapting stimulus on the perceptual task of amplitude discrimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%