2000
DOI: 10.3201/eid0602.000206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrio cholerae O139 in Calcutta, 1992-1998: Incidence, Antibiograms, and Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PFGE analysis of the three V. cholerae O139 isolates ( Fig. 2A, lanes 7 to 9) showed identical patterns which differed from the PFGE patterns of O139 isolates reported during 1992 to 1997 in Calcutta (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PFGE analysis of the three V. cholerae O139 isolates ( Fig. 2A, lanes 7 to 9) showed identical patterns which differed from the PFGE patterns of O139 isolates reported during 1992 to 1997 in Calcutta (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…PFGE analysis of three representative O139 isolates (Fig. 2) clearly showed that the pattern was very different from that of the prevailing O139 clone in Calcutta (2). PFGE of E. coli isolates revealed very interesting results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The reemergence of the O139 serogroup in 1996 demonstrated temporal changes in the epidemiology of cholera. (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the application of molecular methods such as restriction fragment lenght polymorphism (RFLP), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), DNA sequencing, and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (8,13,21,23) have shown clonal diversity among O139 isolates and have revealed the existence of different ribotypes. More recently, comparative studies of O139 strains isolated in the two dominant time periods have shown that, although the reemerging strains of V. cholerae O139 (from 1996 to 1997) had biochemical traits identical to those isolated during the first period, their molecular characterization differed in the organization and number of the CTX element and in ribotype (2,13,14,30). Farfán et al (11) applied the MLEE technique to study a collection of V. cholerae isolates from several countries and sources to determine the genetic relationships between pathogenic clones (O1 and O139) and environmental isolates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical specimens from which V. cholerae was isolated were from patients admitted either to the International Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research, Bangladesh (ICCDR, B) or to the Infectious Diseases Hospital of the National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases (NICED) in Kolkata, India. Methods used for isolation and culture of V. cholerae have been reported elsewhere (41,42). Additional computations detailed in supporting information (SI) Text showed no differences in using the monthly accumulation of cholera cases as a response variable in models instead of incidence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%