2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.063410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrational spectroscopy ofH2+: Hyperfine structure of two-photon transitions

Abstract: We present the computation of two-photon transition spectra between ro-vibrational states of the H + 2 molecular ion, including the effects of hyperfine structure and excitation polarization. The reduced two-photon matrix elements are obtained by means of a variational method. We discuss the implications of our results for high-resolution spectroscopy of H + 2 .

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value corresponds to the center of gravity of the hyperfine structure components of the N + = 1 level of H 2 + . 25 The 54p1 1 ͑0͒ level has three hyperfine components, separated by ϳ0.000 11 and ϳ0.000 05 cm −1 as determined from the transition frequencies in Ref. 6, and were not resolved in the present experiment.…”
Section: Fig 2 Field Ionization Spectra Of H 2 In the Region Of Tramentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This value corresponds to the center of gravity of the hyperfine structure components of the N + = 1 level of H 2 + . 25 The 54p1 1 ͑0͒ level has three hyperfine components, separated by ϳ0.000 11 and ϳ0.000 05 cm −1 as determined from the transition frequencies in Ref. 6, and were not resolved in the present experiment.…”
Section: Fig 2 Field Ionization Spectra Of H 2 In the Region Of Tramentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Very recently Liu et al 16 described a hybrid, experimental-theoretical determination of D 0 based on several transition frequency measurements [16][17][18][19] and theoretical calculations of the energy levels of the H + 2 ion. [20][21][22][23] The dissociation energy D 0 = 36118.06962 cm −1 determined in this way 16 has been reported with uncertainty of ±0.00037 cm −1 -almost two orders of magnitude smaller than that of the previous most accurate determination D 0 = 36118.062 ± 0.010 cm −1 of Zhang et al 15 The best available theoretical predictions of 36118.049 cm −1 from Kolos and Rychlewski 11 and 36118.069 cm −1 from Wolniewicz 12 are significantly less precise and have been reported without any error bar estimates. Both of these predictions involve an incomplete treatment of α 3 QED corrections 24 so it is not clear if the perfect agreement between the experiment and Wolniewicz's calculation is not fortuitous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmission of the former system is 0.9 (polarizer) ×0.98 (quarter-wave plate) = 0.88. Since the intensity of the considered two-photon lines is 8.5 larger in linear polarization [16], and the transition rate being proportional to the square of the laser intensity, the net gain is a factor 8.5 × (0.635/0.88) 2 = 4.4. Table III summarizes published characteristics of Faraday isolators in the 9-10 µm range and at 5.4 µm together with the present results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QCL beam (≈54 mW) is mode-matched to a high finesse (≈1000) Fabry-Perot cavity, that is required both to ensure a Doppler-free geometry with perfectly counterpropagating beams, and to enhance the transition rate (two-photon ro-vibrational transitions in H + 2 being very weak). Optical feedback from the high-finesse cavity is a problem in such an experiment; in the initial setup, isolation was obtained by combining a quarter-wave plate and polarizer with an acousto-optic modulator providing a 6 dB additional isolation through its strongly polarization-dependent efficiency [16]. The total isolation ratio, slightly over 30 dB, was just sufficient to achieve stable operation of the QCL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation