2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.2134701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrational predissociation spectroscopy of the (H2O)6–21− clusters in the OH stretching region: Evolution of the excess electron-binding signature into the intermediate cluster size regime

Abstract: We report vibrational predissociation spectra of the (H2O)n- cluster ions in the OH stretching region to determine whether the spectral signature of the electron-binding motif identified in the smaller clusters [Hammer et al. Science 306, 675 (2004)] continues to be important in the intermediate size regime (n = 7-21). This signature consists of a redshifted doublet that dominates the OH stretching region, and has been traced primarily to the excitation of a single water molecule residing in a double H-bond ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
58
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
10
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This structural pattern is significantly different from that of the aqueous case where acceptor-acceptor (AA) type water molecules with two dangling hydrogen atoms form the dominant electron binding motif. 63,64 For methanol, however, only one hydroxyl hydrogen atom is available for each methanol unit to bind directly to the electron. This results in much weaker electron binding and more diffuse excess electron states in surface state methanol cluster anions than in surface state hydrated electron clusters.…”
Section: Solvated Electron Models Up To the First Solvation Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structural pattern is significantly different from that of the aqueous case where acceptor-acceptor (AA) type water molecules with two dangling hydrogen atoms form the dominant electron binding motif. 63,64 For methanol, however, only one hydroxyl hydrogen atom is available for each methanol unit to bind directly to the electron. This results in much weaker electron binding and more diffuse excess electron states in surface state methanol cluster anions than in surface state hydrated electron clusters.…”
Section: Solvated Electron Models Up To the First Solvation Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…145,146 Elegant experiments made it possible to follow the evolution of vibrational spectra and of reactivity with cluster size, allowing for molecular level descriptions of hydrated clusters. [147][148][149][150] Important and general messages emerged from these studies about the role of the hydration structure around the ionic core in determining spectroscopic and chemical properties of these species. 151 Computational studies predict red shifts in the vibrational spectra of hydrates and emphasize the importance and necessity for anharmonic effects to be treated appropriately to describe their properties.…”
Section: Cluster Models For Condensed Phases Aerosols and Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MD generated configurations can also be compared, at least qualitatively, with the electron binding motifs found experimentally in vibrational predissociation spectra by the Johnson group. 40,41 They identified two different classes for the electron binding sites in ( ) − 6 2 O H clusters, one with a double hydrogen-bonding acceptor (AA) water molecule pointing in the excess electron distribution with two hydrogen atoms, and the other with several, hydrogen-bond acceptor-donor (AD) water molecules with oriented dangling hydrogen atoms toward the electron. Of the two isomers, the one with the AA type water molecule binds the electron more strongly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%