2001
DOI: 10.1021/jp002077f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrational Energy Transfer Modeling of Nonequilibrium Polyatomic Reaction Systems

Abstract: The use of energy transfer data and models in describing nonequilibrium polyatomic reaction systems is discussed with particular emphasis on the information needed for modeling vibrational energy transfer. In the discussion, it is pointed out that key areas of energy transfer knowledge are still lacking and the available experimental data are limited in scope and are of uneven quality. Despite these limitations, it is still possible to carry out meaningful simulations of chemical systems in which vibrational e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
139
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
5
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the good agreement with experiment obtained with the choice of ⟨Δ ⟩ down = 350 cm −1 and the exponential model for energy transfer. This value of ⟨Δ ⟩ down corresponds [27] to an overall average energy transferred in all up and down transitions ⟨Δ ⟩ of about −2.4 kJ mol −1 at 298 K, and a collisional efficiency c = 0.4, which are typical for unimolecular reactions in Ar bath gas as summarized by Troe [28]. Thus our observations at the low-pressure limit may be rationalized in terms of the PES.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Figure 3 shows the good agreement with experiment obtained with the choice of ⟨Δ ⟩ down = 350 cm −1 and the exponential model for energy transfer. This value of ⟨Δ ⟩ down corresponds [27] to an overall average energy transferred in all up and down transitions ⟨Δ ⟩ of about −2.4 kJ mol −1 at 298 K, and a collisional efficiency c = 0.4, which are typical for unimolecular reactions in Ar bath gas as summarized by Troe [28]. Thus our observations at the low-pressure limit may be rationalized in terms of the PES.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This phase is then accounted for simply by multiplying the final computed probability amplitude by the phase factor: . Such corrected probability amplitude can be used to compute the elastic scattering total cross section: (20) and the differential scattering amplitude (needed in calculations of the differential cross section 60 ): (21) where is the Legendre polynomial of th degree. Note that this method can be applied to the inelastic scattering channels as well, but the total inelastic cross sections are insensitive to phases, because probability amplitudes are squared before any other operations in eq…”
Section: Ii5 Scattering Phase and Differential Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 The bath gas was N 2 at 298 K, with Lennard-Jones parameters of σ ) 3.74 Å and ) 82 K. 62,63 Following the same procedures [64][65][66][67] used in our study of isoprene ozonolysis, 68 we estimated Lennard-Jones parameters of σ ) 4.31 Å and ) 297 K for the •C 2 H 5 O 3 minima and transition structures.…”
Section: Iib Rrkm/master Equation Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%