2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-023-03765-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration suppression and stability analysis of a beam at large amplitude excitation using a two-degree-of-freedom nonlinear energy sink

Rajni Kant Kumar,
Anil Kumar
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent developments in TMD technology have focused on refining TMD design beyond the simple SDOF system such as (i) the attachment of a secondary beam structure; (ii) ball damper or pendulum types of dampers; (iii) semi-active/active TMD systems; (iv) tuned liquid column dampers; (v) variable orifice hydraulic actuators; (vi) active variable stiffness dampers; (vii) electrorheological/magnetorheological fluid dampers; and (ix) magnetorheological elastomer–tuned vibration absorbers. Also, recently, a 2DOF nonlinear energy sink was proposed to suppress the vibration of a simply supported beam subjected to large-amplitude excitation in the vicinity of its fundamental frequency [ 6 ]. More specifically, the governing equation of the combined Bernoulli–Euler beam plus the nonlinear energy sink system was treated by Galerkin’s method, with the beam displacement written in terms of the generalized coordinates and the eigenfunctions of the stand-alone beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent developments in TMD technology have focused on refining TMD design beyond the simple SDOF system such as (i) the attachment of a secondary beam structure; (ii) ball damper or pendulum types of dampers; (iii) semi-active/active TMD systems; (iv) tuned liquid column dampers; (v) variable orifice hydraulic actuators; (vi) active variable stiffness dampers; (vii) electrorheological/magnetorheological fluid dampers; and (ix) magnetorheological elastomer–tuned vibration absorbers. Also, recently, a 2DOF nonlinear energy sink was proposed to suppress the vibration of a simply supported beam subjected to large-amplitude excitation in the vicinity of its fundamental frequency [ 6 ]. More specifically, the governing equation of the combined Bernoulli–Euler beam plus the nonlinear energy sink system was treated by Galerkin’s method, with the beam displacement written in terms of the generalized coordinates and the eigenfunctions of the stand-alone beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this vibration minimization is also dependent on the frequency content of the external loads, which implies that optimization is required in order for the TMD to operate in the Sensors 2024, 24, 573 2 of 19 most sensitive frequency band. Alternatively, nonlinear TMDs may be designed [6] which exhibit a variable (i.e., load dependent) natural frequency. A classification [7] of basic TMD technology distinguishes between (i) composite TMD design, (ii) distributed TMD design, (iii) MDOF TMD design and (iv) impact dampers in conjunction with a TMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%