1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2852(83)90324-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration-rotational and rotational intensities for CO isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
70
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not the case when two experimental EDMFs Tipping 1983 andChackerian et al 1984) are compared as shows Goorvitch (1994) in his Table 5.…”
Section: Calculations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is not the case when two experimental EDMFs Tipping 1983 andChackerian et al 1984) are compared as shows Goorvitch (1994) in his Table 5.…”
Section: Calculations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These values are also presented in Table 6. Then, the 13 CO column density can be calculated as follows (Garden et al 1991): where B=55101.012 MHz is the rotational constant, μ D =0.11 debyes is the permanent dipole moment for 13 CO, and J is the rotational quantum number of the lower state in the observed transition (Chackerian & Tipping 1983). In this paper, we adopt a typical abundance ratio of Hawkins & Jura (1987) for the solar neighborhood and the ratio of ∼70 in the Galaxy shown by Penzias (1980).…”
Section: Results Of Pmo Molecular Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 and 7 below, where we adopted a conservative error bar of ±0.2 dex in the CNO abundances by Harris & Lambert). Goortvitch (1994) indeed reported differences up to 3% in the A-values with respect to Chackerian & Tipping (1983) and up to a factor ∼6 in the dipole moments in some of the CO isotopes. On the other hand, note that the isotopic lines used are very weak so that the choice of the specific lines might affect the results, in a systematic manner (see above the discussion on the selection of the lines) if there is a systematic difference in the continuum placement.…”
Section: Analysis Of the C And O Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In particular, the 16 O/ 17 O and 16 O/ 18 O ratios increase. Secondly, the gf-values of the CO lines used by Harris & Lambert (1984) were obtained from Chackerian & Tipping (1983), while here we used those by Goorvitch (1994) on the basis of a more up-to-date electric dipole moment function. As a consequence, 7 These authors give only the C abundance derived ([C/H] = −0.7 and −0.3, respectively) without any indication of the N and O abundances derived/adopted, nor error bars.…”
Section: Analysis Of the C And O Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%