2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration reduction in aerospace structures via an optimized modified positive velocity feedback control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A piezoelectric ceramic made by Piezo Systems, Inc.®, is used with properties as given in Table 2. The piezoelectric patch is attached on an aluminum cantilever beam using epoxy (Omidi et al, 2015) as shown in Figure 14. The cantilever beam properties are given in Table 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A piezoelectric ceramic made by Piezo Systems, Inc.®, is used with properties as given in Table 2. The piezoelectric patch is attached on an aluminum cantilever beam using epoxy (Omidi et al, 2015) as shown in Figure 14. The cantilever beam properties are given in Table 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal capacitance of the piezoelectric used in this research is found to be 56 nF. The first two resonant frequencies of the cantilever beam are 10.53 Hz and 62.7 Hz (Omidi, Mahmoodi, & Shepard Jr., 2015). The second resonant frequency of the beam is used in this research as the frequency of the excitation since the first resonant frequency of the cantilever beam does not provide sufficient output voltage in the linear vibration region.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of the Energy Harvesting Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation of the proposed control method. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control method, here an isotropic cantilever beam with geometrical and mechanical parameters of L = 0:325 m, t b = 0:00158 m, b = 12:7 mm, n = 0:3, r = 2710Kg/m 3 , E ¼ 2:5 GPa is considered (Omidi et al, 2015). The actuator and the sensor patches are located at l 1 = l 3 = 0:05 m with the geometry of l 2 À l 1 = l 4 À l 3 = 31:75 mm, b = 12:7 mm and t a = t s = 0:5 mm.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A real‐coded GA‐based linear quadratic regulator (LQR) control scheme for smart fiber‐reinforced polymer composite shell structures was presented by Roy and Chakraborty, in which the purpose aimed at maximizing the closed‐loop damping ratio while keeping actuators voltages within the limit of breakdown voltage. Omidi et al proposed a modified positive velocity feedback‐based control approach, which combines the M‐norm optimization model to improve the multimode suppression performance of the vibration controller. More introductions of optimal active control may be referred by several studies …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%