2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration of damaged beams under a moving mass: theory and experimental validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First natural frequency tends to decrease when there is damage (Salawu, 1997) whilst deflection increases (Bilello & Bergman, 2004). Nowadays, alternatives to the traditional SHM techniques are needed, given that many of these monitoring methodologies require the installation of complex and expensive sensing and data handling electronics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First natural frequency tends to decrease when there is damage (Salawu, 1997) whilst deflection increases (Bilello & Bergman, 2004). Nowadays, alternatives to the traditional SHM techniques are needed, given that many of these monitoring methodologies require the installation of complex and expensive sensing and data handling electronics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bilello and Bergman (2004) provided an analytical tool for the analysis of a damaged beam under a moving mass. Bellino et al (2009) presented a time-varying identification method to detect a crack in a beam with a moving mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bellino et al [2] presented a time-varying identification method to detect a crack in a beam with a moving mass. Considering that natural frequencies of real structures are affected by environmental conditions such as the mass and the velocity of the train, Bellino et al [3] established the relationship between the natural frequencies and the load characteristics. They proposed a damage identification method to detect the presence of damage in a railway bridge crossed by a train using the principal component analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%