2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration Control of a Tall Benchmark Building under Wind and Earthquake Excitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kwag et al 28 . transferred a probabilistic risk‐assessment framework into a deterministic performance‐based framework to consider multiple hazards in structural design, and other studies have focused on the development of vibration control systems for tall buildings to reduce multi‐hazard vibrations 29,30 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kwag et al 28 . transferred a probabilistic risk‐assessment framework into a deterministic performance‐based framework to consider multiple hazards in structural design, and other studies have focused on the development of vibration control systems for tall buildings to reduce multi‐hazard vibrations 29,30 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kwag et al 28 transferred a probabilistic risk-assessment framework into a deterministic performance-based framework to consider multiple hazards in structural design, and other studies have focused on the development of vibration control systems for tall buildings to reduce multi-hazard vibrations. 29,30 Most of the studies above have mainly focused either on generating multi-hazard scenarios or assessing structural performance under multiple hazards by applying each hazard separately, thus ignoring possible subsequent effects (e.g. damage accumulation, fatigue, strength and stiffness deterioration).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, wind-induced vibrations can be reduced in three different ways: (1) by changing the stiffness or mass, (2) by increasing the damping with passive or active control devices [3][4][5][6][23][24][25][26], and (3) by reducing wind loads with aerodynamic shapes such as tapering. e fact that a tapered tall building might spread the vortex shedding over a broad range of frequencies makes it more effective for reducing across-wind responses has been established [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A design framework that takes into account seismic loading and strong synoptic wind has recently been proposed [13]. Other studies focused on dealing with multihazards are [14,15], although no studies have been conducted to determine the ductility requirements of damaged structures under additional effects of thunderstorm downbursts. This paper investigates the seismic response and the effects of the downburst outflow wind at mean speeds ranging between 33m/s and 75m/s on the ductility of damaged buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%