2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration-based structural damage identification using wavelet transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several related damage identification methods are ANFIS-2D-WT, CBR, ZOM, and Wavelet-Neuro-Fuzzy, which can be found in references (Bayissa et al, 2008;Escamilla-Ambrosio, Liu, Lieven, & Ramirez-Cortes, 2011;Kolakowski, 2006;Sunny & Kapania, 2011).…”
Section: Comparisons Of Related Damage Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several related damage identification methods are ANFIS-2D-WT, CBR, ZOM, and Wavelet-Neuro-Fuzzy, which can be found in references (Bayissa et al, 2008;Escamilla-Ambrosio, Liu, Lieven, & Ramirez-Cortes, 2011;Kolakowski, 2006;Sunny & Kapania, 2011).…”
Section: Comparisons Of Related Damage Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous techniques have been introduced for the damage detection of aircraft structures, among which the vibration based approaches have been widely exploited (Bayissa, Haritos, & Thelandersson, 2008;Budipriyanto, Haddara, & Swamidas, 2007;Duffey, Doebling, Farrar, Baker, & Rhee, 2001). These methods are based on the fact that any structure can be interpreted as a dynamic system with stiffness, mass and damping.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a damage localization to be successful, the reference finite element model must be as accurate as possible; otherwise, the procedure will lead to incorrect results. Bayissa et al [28] proposed a damage identification method using wavelet transformation and applied the method to a steel plate girder of a bridge for damage identification. Deraemaeker et al [29] developed a structural health monitoring process using vibration data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor has many advantages of optical fiber sensor such as simple structure, small volume, light weight, etc [3,4,5]. Many scholars have carried out a lot of research on the damage identification methods based on FBG sensors [6,7,8]. Capoluongo proved that the FBG sensor can replace the accelerometer in vibration test for the structure damage detection [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%