2016
DOI: 10.1177/1369433216649853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration-based damage identification of an unreinforced masonry house model

Abstract: Non-destructive vibration-based damage identification techniques are especially attractive for assessing damage in structures of high historical and architectural value. So far, most studies have focused on slender structures built using relatively homogeneous materials. In this study, global damage identification methods based on vibration response parameters were applied for identifying damage in an unreinforced masonry full-scale house model (non-homogeneous material and non-slender structure). The house mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moderate to strong earthquakes cause damage to existing masonry buildings which have not been constructed to resist earthquake forces, as depicted in Figure 1 (Ahmadizadeh and Shakib, 2004; Baitao and Guixin, 2018; Baitao and Peilei, 2015; Ferreira et al, 2017; Hao et al, 2016; Jingya et al, 2013; Kaplan et al, 2010; Lin et al, 2017; Okamura et al, 2015; Oyarzo-Vera et al, 2017; Preciado and Orduna, 2014; Tama et al, 2013; Wenfeng et al, 2017). Worldwide, various techniques have been proposed and applied for seismic retrofitting of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls such as reinforcement centercore, confinement with reinforced concrete (RC) strips, adding RC layers, fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) layers, fiber-reinforced cementitious composite shotcrete, twisted stainless steel near surface mounted (TSNSM), post-tensioning, and external reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderate to strong earthquakes cause damage to existing masonry buildings which have not been constructed to resist earthquake forces, as depicted in Figure 1 (Ahmadizadeh and Shakib, 2004; Baitao and Guixin, 2018; Baitao and Peilei, 2015; Ferreira et al, 2017; Hao et al, 2016; Jingya et al, 2013; Kaplan et al, 2010; Lin et al, 2017; Okamura et al, 2015; Oyarzo-Vera et al, 2017; Preciado and Orduna, 2014; Tama et al, 2013; Wenfeng et al, 2017). Worldwide, various techniques have been proposed and applied for seismic retrofitting of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls such as reinforcement centercore, confinement with reinforced concrete (RC) strips, adding RC layers, fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) layers, fiber-reinforced cementitious composite shotcrete, twisted stainless steel near surface mounted (TSNSM), post-tensioning, and external reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, the results obtained from the measurements can be considered almost accurate [1]. The application of well-known different identification techniques include: The Crystal-Clear Stochastic Subspace Identification (CC-SSI) method [2], the Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) method [3], and the Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (EFDD) method [4]. The use of the ambient vibration measurements has been proven to be relatively fast, cost reducing and economically efficient for the determination of dynamic characteristics [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory tests have been proposed to improve methodologies for dynamic identification and damage detection of existing masonry structures, both on full-scale masonry buildings [15] and on masonry wall panels [16,17], with attention focused on damage indicators. In particular, in the work [17], damage has been specifically induced in a masonry panel and the modal response of the specimens has been extracted in order to evaluate the structural health for different levels of damage, with the purpose of detecting possible correlations between variations in the modal properties and the entity of the damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%