2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16122210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration and Noise Transmitted by Agricultural Backpack Powered Machines Critically Examined Using the Current Standards

Abstract: European Directives 2002/44/EC and 2003/10/EC establish the exposure limit values for preventing operators’ risks to vibration and noise transmitted by machines. Few studies studied noise and vibration of agricultural backpack powered machines (as mist blowers and blowers), but nobody critically studied them. This work analyzed the field back vibration, hand-arm vibration (HAV), and noise transmitted to ten operators by eight blowers and mist blowers. Unweighted and weighted vibration were analyzed, using the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study results from one chainsaw model, which had the similar tool characteristics but was lighter compared to the chainsaw in the current study -2.2±0.5 m/s 2 on the front handle and 2.0±0.8 m/s 2 on the rear handle, were somewhat lower than the findings on the gloved hand, 3.1±0.7 m/s 2 on the left hand and 3.3±0.5 m/s 2 on the right hand in the current study. Calvo et al examined the vibration of multiple agricultural backpack blowers with 2.9-3.6 kW engine power, weighing 11-12 kg at 6,160-7,000 rpm; the mean acceleration value measured at the control handle was 1.7±0.5 m/s 2 -similar to results obtained in the current study -1.6±0.4m/s 2 [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The study results from one chainsaw model, which had the similar tool characteristics but was lighter compared to the chainsaw in the current study -2.2±0.5 m/s 2 on the front handle and 2.0±0.8 m/s 2 on the rear handle, were somewhat lower than the findings on the gloved hand, 3.1±0.7 m/s 2 on the left hand and 3.3±0.5 m/s 2 on the right hand in the current study. Calvo et al examined the vibration of multiple agricultural backpack blowers with 2.9-3.6 kW engine power, weighing 11-12 kg at 6,160-7,000 rpm; the mean acceleration value measured at the control handle was 1.7±0.5 m/s 2 -similar to results obtained in the current study -1.6±0.4m/s 2 [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…1.1.3 | Health and safety Although there is very little information on health and safety aspects specifically for the cultivation of miscanthus, the literature provides a general overview of on-farm health and safety. Health risks in agriculture have been related to accidents involving heavy machinery (Fargnoli et al, 2018), exposure to vibration, noise (Calvo et al, 2019) and dust (Rumchev et al, 2019), transmission of diseases from animals to humans (Mori & Roest, 2018), musculoskeletal disorders (Kumaraveloo & Lunner Kolstrup, 2018), and exposure to pesticides (Kim et al, 2017) and fertilizers (Ahmed et al, 2017;Hill et al, 2019), among others.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no standardized methods for HAV exposure assessment. Many studies traditionally have measured acceleration values directly from tools by mounting an accelerometer on the tool handle 2–6 while more recent studies have measured vibration magnitude at the hand‐handle interface using hand‐held/hand‐mounted adapters in which an accelerometer is attached to or inserted 7,8 . Most recently, vibration dosimeters integrated with hand adapters 9,10 are available which enable to obtain daily exposure dose while minimizing interference with job activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%