2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration and impulsivity analysis of hand held olive beaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vibration signals, therefore, followed a scaling factor depending on the canopy zone in which the vibration occurred. There was a lower presence of impacts for these signals, as indicated by the crest factor value, when compared to the shaker combs used for olive harvesting, which have a similar resultant acceleration distribution [ 8 , 34 ]. The low forward speed, which was outside the usual values of 0.8 to 1.5 km h −1 employed with lateral canopy shakers, not only increased the vibration time, but also significantly reduced the working capacity of the values of 0.25–0.50 ha h −1 indicated by other authors [ 26 , 27 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vibration signals, therefore, followed a scaling factor depending on the canopy zone in which the vibration occurred. There was a lower presence of impacts for these signals, as indicated by the crest factor value, when compared to the shaker combs used for olive harvesting, which have a similar resultant acceleration distribution [ 8 , 34 ]. The low forward speed, which was outside the usual values of 0.8 to 1.5 km h −1 employed with lateral canopy shakers, not only increased the vibration time, but also significantly reduced the working capacity of the values of 0.25–0.50 ha h −1 indicated by other authors [ 26 , 27 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibration measurement values based on the first power of the two weightings W h and W h50lp provided the strongest indicators for developing any form of HAVS in a British study 44 . Field measurement with source signals filtered by the W h‐bl filter (ISO/TS 15694) may be more appropriate, because the weighting filter W h used in ISO 5349‐1 (unlike the W h‐bl filter) could underestimate the effect of high‐frequency vibration on vibration‐induced finger disorders 46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few studies on the impact of noise and HAV exposure in the olive sector. Some studies on hand-harvesters [ 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 ] only assess the HAV exposure received by the worker, with values almost always above the EAV set by Directive 2003/10/EC [ 75 ] and sometimes above the ELV.…”
Section: Occupational Hav and Noise In The Olive Oil Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%