2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-624x(99)00166-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viability of plant cell suspensions exposed to homogeneous ultrasonic fields of different energy density and wave type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies by Doblhoffdier et al [66] suggested that there was no significant loss in the viability of mammalian cells suspended in a large ultrasonic resonator at operating power levels. This conclusion was also reached in a study by Bohm et al [67] using a similar chamber. These authors noted a significant difference between the response of cells to standing and travelling waves of similar frequency and pressure amplitude and a review of the behaviour of cells in such large resonators under different operating conditions was provided by Shirgaonkar et al [68].…”
Section: Cell Viabilitysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Studies by Doblhoffdier et al [66] suggested that there was no significant loss in the viability of mammalian cells suspended in a large ultrasonic resonator at operating power levels. This conclusion was also reached in a study by Bohm et al [67] using a similar chamber. These authors noted a significant difference between the response of cells to standing and travelling waves of similar frequency and pressure amplitude and a review of the behaviour of cells in such large resonators under different operating conditions was provided by Shirgaonkar et al [68].…”
Section: Cell Viabilitysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…There is also evidence that the ultrasonic energy does not affect the viability of biological cells. 21,22 The technology is also promising for replacing magnetic beads in many bio-assays, providing finer control over beads, enhancing bead to surface interaction, and reducing cost by eliminating the specialised magnetic beads. The integrated optical wave guide permits fluorescence probing at the fluid/ reflector interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Although ultrasound can be used to destroy 19 or sonoporate cells, 20 there is growing evidence that at the intensity levels required for manipulation, cell viability 21,22 and their ability to proliferate 23 is maintained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soyabean, cowpea, maize, wheat, Ohio buckeye -various tissues SAAT* 55 kHz/ 0.2-100s/50W/10-20 × 2-4 mm clumps in 1 ml in 13×100 mm glass tube [15] Soyabean embryogenic callus SAAT* 55 kHz/ 0-300s/50W/10-20 × 2-4 mm clumps in 1 ml in 13×100 mm glass tube [16] Soyabean immature embryos SAAT* 55 kHz/ 0.1-10s/50W /10 cots in 0.5 ml in 1.5 ml microfuge tube [17] Soyabean cotyledonary nodes SAAT* 55 kHz/6-600s/50W/10 explants covered in Agrobacterium solution in 16×125 mm glass tube [18] Ohio buckeye SAAT* 55 kHz/ 0-60s/50W /10 embryogenic clumps in 1 ml in 13×100 mm glass tube [19] Robina pseudoacacia cotyledon SAAT* 30 kHz/ 60s/ 60 W /10 explants in 20 ml in 50 ml Falcon tube [20] Squash cotyledon explant multiple shoot regeneration 47 kHz/ 30-120s/ 35W/ 20 explants (420 mg) in 10 ml in 25×150 mm glass tube [21,22] Ultrasound can be supplied as a continuous waveform, or as pulses, propagating wave or standing wave, a fact little discussed in the literature of plant tissue culture. The waveform was of importance for survival of Petunia hybrida cell suspensions, as propagating waves reduce cell viability compared to standing wave fields of equal energy density [24]. The biophysics of ultrasound effects has been reviewed [25,26].…”
Section: The Generation Of Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%