2004
DOI: 10.1177/1524839903258222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viability of Parks and Recreation Centers as Sites for Youth Physical Activity Promotion

Abstract: This descriptive study explored the potential for public parks and recreation centers as intervention sites for promoting physical activity among youth. Directors (55% women) of 44 recreation centers in San Diego County completed a survey of their centers' physical activity programming for youths ages 3 to 17 years (response rate = 60%). On an average weekday, 373 (SD = 782) youths participated in physical activity at a center. More boys attended than girls (p <.05). Some centers sponsored after-school program… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, community agencies reported current involvement in partnerships with schools and other community organizations. These results are congruent with the supportive findings from other studies (Henderson et al, 2001;Moody et al, 2004; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health & National Recreation & Park Association, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, community agencies reported current involvement in partnerships with schools and other community organizations. These results are congruent with the supportive findings from other studies (Henderson et al, 2001;Moody et al, 2004; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health & National Recreation & Park Association, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Parks are encouraging sites for promoting PA because their provision and management can be influenced through public policy (10,53), but all groups do not always have equal access to policy making processes (54). Unlike many other park audit tools, the CPAT was designed with and for nonresearchers as a user-friendly yet reliable instrument that could be incorporated into community evaluation and advocacy efforts (34).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interviews were based on developed protocols and began with introductions and an explanation of the key informant interview process. 31,33,34 Occasional research team meetings were held to discuss the process of the interviews, identify issues, and troubleshoot any problems that may have arisen. 35 Neighborhood Tours.…”
Section: Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%