2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-015-2002-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viability of nonminimally coupled $$f\,(R)$$ f ( R ) gravity

Abstract: In this work we explore the viability of nonminimally coupled mattercurvature gravity theories, namely the conditions required for the absence of tachyon instabilities and ghost degrees of freedom. We contrast our finds with recent claims of a pathological behaviour of this class of models, which resorted to, in our view, an incorrect analogy with k-essence.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That this redefinition is always possible renders the concerns of Ref. [6] moot, in particular we do not find a "more complex dependency of the putative k-essence function p on φ" that is "much more evolved than assumed". In the Appendix (1) we explicitly derive, from the action (1), the equivalent action (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…That this redefinition is always possible renders the concerns of Ref. [6] moot, in particular we do not find a "more complex dependency of the putative k-essence function p on φ" that is "much more evolved than assumed". In the Appendix (1) we explicitly derive, from the action (1), the equivalent action (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The latter point of view was not taken in the recently published paper [6], where it was argued e.g. that the constraints do not apply to "models in which there is only baryonic matter" and that "faster-than-light propagation of perturbations for a particular matter species does not invalidate the underlying theory, but instead shows that the adopted matter content is unphysical".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations